Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;55(9):3827–3832. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3267-y

Table 1.

Antioxidant capacity of S. annuum, S. anguivi and their mixture

Weight ratio (CA:SA) Ethanolic extract Hexane–acetone extract
RRP RSA (%) RRP RSA (%)
CA1.2–SA0.0 1.0053 ± 0.016 65.00 ± 1.00 1.5946 ± 0.06 43.75 ± 0.35
CA1.1–SA0.1 1.2306 ± 0.017 74.69 ± 0.31 1.0573 ± 0.017 56.125 ± 0.125
CA1.0–SA0.2 1.6813 ± 0.017 86.13 ± 0.13 1.5599 ± 0.035 60.50 ± 0.50
CA0.8–SA0.4 1.6813 ± 0.02 87.50 ± 0.00 1.9586 ± 0.0174 62.75 ± 0.25
CA0.6–SA0.6 1.9586 ± 0.016 87.25 ± 0.25 2.3919 ± 0.035 73.35 ± 0.35
CA0.4–SA0.8 1.7506 ± 0.03 74.50 ± 0.50 1.8199 ± 0.017 82.25 ± 0.25
CA0.2–SA1.0 2.7385 ± 0.035 84.50 ± 0.50 2.0452 ± 0.035 37.25 ± 0.25
CA0.1–SA1.1 2.1492 ± 0.069 84.80 ± 0.20 1.4212 ± 0.03 70.50 ± 0.5
CA0.0–SA1.2 2.010 ± 0.06 69.38 ± 0.40 0.6933 ± 0.00 53.00 ± 0.00

CA C. annuum, SA S.anguivi, RSA radical scavenging activity, RRP relative reducing power