Table 2.
Interaction effects of C. annuum and S. anguivi extracts in mixture of different weight ratio
| Weight ratio (CA:SA) | Ethanolic extract | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRP | RSA (%) | |||||
| Exp | Theoretical | Synergist effect | Exp | Theoretical | Synergist effect | |
| CA1.1–SA0.1 | 1.2306 | 1.089 | 1.13002 | 74.69 | 65.365 | 1.143 |
| CA1.0–SA0.2 | 1.6812 | 1.173 | 1.433 | 86.13 | 65.73 | 1.310 |
| CA0.8–SA0.4 | 1.6812 | 1.340 | 1.255 | 87.50 | 66.46 | 1.316 |
| CA0.6–SA0.6 | 1.9586 | 1.5077 | 1.2991 | 87.25 | 67.19 | 1.298 |
| CA0.4–SA0.8 | 1.7506 | 1.6751 | 1.045 | 74.50 | 67.92 | 1.097 |
| CA0.2–SA1.0 | 2.7385 | 1.843 | 1.486 | 84.50 | 68.65 | 1.320 |
| CA0.1–SA1.1 | 2.149 | 1.9263 | 1.1156 | 84.80 | 69.095 | 1.229 |
| Weight ratio (CA:SA) | Hexane–acetone extract | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRP | RSA (%) | |||||
| Exp | Theoretical | Synergist effect | Exp | Theoretical | Synergist effect | |
| CA1.1–SA0.1 | 1.0573 | 1.5195 | 0.696 | 56.125 | 44.52 | 1.2607 |
| CA1.0–SA0.2 | 1.5599 | 1.4443 | 1.08 | 60.50 | 45.29 | 1.3358 |
| CA0.8–SA0.4 | 1.9586 | 1.2942 | 1.5134 | 62.75 | 46.83 | 1.340 |
| CA0.6–SA0.6 | 2.3919 | 1.1439 | 2.019 | 73.35 | 48.375 | 1.516 |
| CA0.4–SA0.8 | 1.8199 | 0.9937 | 1.831 | 82.25 | 49.92 | 1.648 |
| CA0.2–SA1.0 | 2.045 | 0.8435 | 2.424 | 37.25 | 51.46 | 0.723 |
| CA0.1–SA1.1 | 1.4212 | 0.7684 | 1.8496 | 70.50 | 52.23 | 1.350 |
CA C. annuum, SA S.anguivi, RSA radical scavenging activity, RRP relative reducing power