Table 2.
N | Overall % if no specialty difference | Rheum % | Neph % | ∗p-value of specialty difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario A | 122 | ||||
Cyclophosphamide | 77 | ∗ | 36.4 | 63.6 | p=0.0114 |
+ IV/PO Steroid | 71 | 92.2 | |||
+ Rituximab | 26 | ∗ | 61.5 | 38.5 | p=0.001 |
+ Plasmapheresis | 14 | 19.5 | |||
+ Rituximab + Plasmapheresis | 9 | 11.7 | |||
Rituximab without Cyclophosphamide | 39 | 60 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid | 36 | 92.3 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid + Plasmapheresis | 6 | 15.4 | |||
IV/PO Steroid without Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, or Plasmapheresis | 6 | ∗ | 0 | 100 | p<0.0001 |
| |||||
Scenario B My preferences would be different than that chosen in Scenario A |
75 | 61.5 | |||
Cyclophosphamide | 61 | 81.3 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid | 52 | 85.3 | |||
+ Rituximab | 23 | ∗ | 65.2 | 34.8 | p=0.0185 |
+ Plasmapheresis | 40 | 65.6 | |||
+ Rituximab + Plasmapheresis | 17 | 27.8 | |||
Rituximab without Cyclophosphamide | 7 | 9.3 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid | 0 | 0 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid + Plasmapheresis | 7 | 100 | |||
Plasmapheresis without Cyclophosphamide or Rituximab | 6 | ∗ | 0 | 100 | p<0.0001 |
Other i | 1 | 1.3 | |||
| |||||
Scenario C My preferences would be different than that chosen in Scenario A |
72 | ∗ | 47.2 | 67.7 | p=0.0232 |
Cyclophosphamide | 45 | 63.4 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid | 40 | 88.9 | |||
+ Rituximab | 16 | 35.6 | |||
+ Plasmapheresis | 40 | 88.9 | |||
+ Rituximab + Plasmapheresis | 13 | 32.5 | |||
Rituximab without Cyclophosphamide | 13 | 18.3 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid | 12 | 92.3 | |||
+ IV/PO Steroid + Plasmapheresis | 10 | 83.3 | |||
Plasmapheresis without Cyclophosphamide or Rituximab | 11 | 13.4 | |||
Other ii | 3 | 4.1 |
iOne subject chose ‘other' but did not describe treatment in free text.
iiOne subject chose ‘other' but did not describe treatment in free text; two did not select any option.