Table 4.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting life satisfaction by income and mindfulness.
| Predictor | ΔR2 | p | B | p | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 0.18 | 0.0000 | |||
| Control variablesa | |||||
| Step 2 | 0.16 | 0.0000 | |||
| Income (log) | 0.54 | 0.2064 | [−0.30, 1.38] | ||
| Observing | 0.16 | 0.0306 | [0.02, 0.31] | ||
| Describing | 0.21 | 0.0028 | [0.07, 0.34] | ||
| Acting with awareness | 0.05 | 0.4510 | [−0.09, 0.20] | ||
| Non-judging | 0.30 | 0.0000 | [0.16, 0.44] | ||
| Non-reacting | 0.34 | 0.0001 | [0.17, 0.51] | ||
| Step 3 | 0.01 | 0.1420 | |||
| Income × Observing | −0.05 | 0.4278 | [−0.19, 0.08] | ||
| Income × Describing | 0.06 | 0.3071 | [−0.06, 0.18] | ||
| Income × Acting with Awareness | −0.18 | 0.0050 | [−0.30, −0.05] | ||
| Income × Non-judging | 0.05 | 0.4909 | [−0.09, 0.18] | ||
| Income × Non-reacting | 0.01 | 0.8697 | [−0.13, 0.15] |
aAge, sex, residence (prefecture), job, education, and marital status (dummy coded).