Table 5.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting psychological well-being by income and mindfulness.
| Predictor | ΔR2 | p | B | p | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 0.16 | 0.0001 | |||
| Control variablesa | |||||
| Step 2 | 0.33 | 0.0000 | |||
| Income (log) | 1.87 | 0.2447 | [−1.28, 5.01] | ||
| Observing | 1.47 | 0.0000 | [0.92, 2.02] | ||
| Describing | 1.82 | 0.0000 | [1.31, 2.32] | ||
| Acting with awareness | 0.78 | 0.0040 | [0.25, 1.31] | ||
| Non-judging | 1.39 | 0.0000 | [0.86, 1.92] | ||
| Non-reacting | 1.06 | 0.0011 | [0.42, 1.69] | ||
| Step 3 | 0.17 | 0.0128 | |||
| Income × Observing | −0.48 | 0.0552 | [−0.98, 0.01] | ||
| Income × Describing | −0.52 | 0.0222 | [−0.96, −0.07] | ||
| Income × Acting with Awareness | 0.45 | 0.0585 | [−0.02, 0.91] | ||
| Income × Non-judging | −0.68 | 0.0077 | [−1.18, −0.18] | ||
| Income × Non-reacting | 0.32 | 0.2441 | [−0.22, 0.85] |
aAge, sex, residence (prefecture), job, education, and marital status (dummy coded).