Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;9:1287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01287

Table 2.

Number of participants using spatial descriptions involving intrinsic (Int) and relative (Rel) frames (with percentages in brackets) for each probe for each condition in Experiment 1. (Note that the use of other types of description were excluded.)

Probe 1
Probe 2
Probe 3
Prior Description Int Rel Int Rel Int Rel
No Visual cue
Intrinsic 44 (83%) 9 (17%) 45 (87%) 7 (13%) 47 (87%) 7 (13%)
Relative 15 (25%) 45 (75%) 17 (29%) 41 (71%) 18 (32%) 38 (68%)
Neutral 27 (53%) 24 (47%) 34 (63%) 20 (37%) 35 (65%) 19 (35%)
86 (52%) 78 (48%) 96 (59%) 68 (41%) 100 (61%) 64 (39%)
Intrinsic Visual cue
Intrinsic 26 (90%) 3 (10%) 28 (88%) 4 (12%) 28 (88%) 4 (12%)
Relative 13 (42%) 18 (58%) 19 (59%) 13 (41%) 21 (70%) 9 (30%)
Neutral 19 (86%) 3 (14%) 19 (90%) 2 (10%) 18 (90%) 2 (10%)
58 (71%) 24 (29%) 66 (78%) 19 (22%) 67 (82%) 15 (18%)
Relative Visual cue
Intrinsic 40 (89%) 5 (11%) 38 (93%) 3 (7%) 39 (95%) 2 (5%)
Relative 9 (20%) 35 (80%) 3 (8%) 33 (92%) 12 (28%) 31 (72%)
Neutral 5 (31%) 11 (69%) 9 (50%) 9 (50%) 8 (44%) 10 (56%)
54 (51%) 51 (49%) 50 (53%) 45 (47%) 59 (58%) 43 (42%)