Table 4.
Number of participants using spatial descriptions involving intrinsic (Int) and relative (Rel) frames (with percentages in brackets) for each probe for each condition in Experiment 2.
| Probe 1 |
Probe 2 |
Probe 3 |
Probe 4 |
Probe 5 |
Probe 6 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Int | Rel | Int | Rel | Int | Rel | Int | Rel | Int | Rel | Int | Rel | |
| Intrin. | 16 (76) | 5 (24) | 18 (86) | 3 (14) | 18 (86) | 3 (14) | 18 (86) | 3 (14) | 18 (86) | 3 (14) | 18 (86) | 3 (14) |
| Relat. | 3 (16) | 16 (84) | 4 (21) | 15 (79) | 7 (37) | 12 (63) | 7 (37) | 12 (63) | 7 (37) | 12 (63) | 6 (32) | 13 (68) |
| Neu. | 8 (19)) | 34 (81) | 8 (19) | 34 (81) | 10 (24) | 32 (76) | 13 (31) | 29 (69) | 13 (31) | 29 (69) | 16 (38) | 26 (62) |
Note that the use of other types of description were excluded. Intrin., Intrinsic linguistic example condition, Relat., Relative linguistic example, and Neu., Neutral.