Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 15;45(8):951–962. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14497

Table 2.

Mean % reduction from baseline to week 2 in total lesion counts (primary end‐point) for clindamycin phosphate 1.2% (CLNP)/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3% fixed‐dose combination gel versus combination therapy of adapalene 0.1% (ADA) + CLNP (MMRM analysis [ITT population])

CLNP/BPO 3% (n = 172) ADA + CLNP (n = 177)
n 169 176
Mean (SD) −46.3 (24.4) −39.3 (29.3)
Adjusted mean (SE) −42.2 (1.9) −35.3 (1.9)
Difference vs ADA + CLNP (MMRM) −6.83
Difference vs ADA + CLNP (unadjusted; post‐hoc) −6.92
95% CI for treatment difference (MMRM) −11.88 to −1.78
95% CI for treatment difference (unadjusted; post‐hoc) −12.64 to −1.20
P‐value (MMRM) 0.008
P‐value (unadjusted; post‐hoc) 0.018

ADA, adapalene; BPO, benzoyl peroxide; CI, confidence interval; CLNP, clindamycin phosphate; ITT, intent‐to‐treat; MMRM, mixed model for repeated measures SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.