Skip to main content
. 2018 May 6;35(8):1096–1104. doi: 10.1111/dme.13629

Table 1.

Demographic data and baseline characteristics of participants

5 mg empagliflozin 10 mg empagliflozin 25 mg empagliflozin Total
Number of participants, n (%) 9 (100) 8 (100) 10 (100) 27 (100)
Sex, n (%)
Male 3 (33.3) 3 (37.5) 3 (30.0) 9 (33.3)
Female 6 (66.7) 5 (62.5) 7 (70.0) 18 (66.7)
Race, n (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native 0 3 (37.5) 0 3 (11.1)
Asian 1 (11.1) 0 0 1 (3.7)
Black/African American 3 (33.3) 4 (50.0) 4 (40.0) 11 (40.7)
Hawaiian/Pacific Isle 0 0 0 0
White 5 (55.6) 1 (12.5) 6 (60.0) 12 (44.4)
Mean (sd) age, years 13.7 (2.0) 14.5 (1.9) 14.2 (2.1) 14.1 (2.0)
Mean (sd) weight, kg 90.0 (19.0) 111.0 (21.3) 91.1 (25.7) 96.7 (23.5)
Mean (sd) BMI, kg/m2 33.9 (5.8) 39.6 (6.2) 33.7 (7.0) 35.5 (6.7)
Mean (sd) BMI SDS 2.9 (0.7) 3.4 (0.5) 2.8 (0.9) 3.0 (0.8)
Smoking status, n (%)
Never smoked 9 (100) 8 (100) 9 (90.0) 26 (96.3)
Ex‐smoker 0 0 0 0
Currently smokes 0 0 1 (10.0) 1 (3.7)
Follow diet/exercise recommendation, n (%)
No 2 (22.2) 1 (12.5) 1 (10.0) 4 (14.8)
Yes 7 (77.8) 7 (87.5) 9 (90.0) 23 (85.2)
Background therapy, n (%)
None 1 (11.1) 3 (37.5) 2 (20.0) 6 (22.2)
Metformin alone 5 (55.6) 3 (37.5) 6 (60.0) 14 (51.9)
Insulin alone 0 0 0 0
Metformin and insulin 3 (33.3) 2 (25.0) 2 (20.0) 7 (25.9)
Mean (sd) eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2 178.3 (17.4) 162.3 (38.8) 157.3 (15.2) 165.8 (25.8)
Mean (sd) urinary glucose excretion, g/24 h 16.2 (30.3)a 12.3 (25.4) 0.08 (0.05) 8.8 (22.1)
Mean (sd) HbA1c, mmol/mol 57 57 45 53
Mean (sd) HbA1c, % 7.4 (1.4) 7.4 (1.1) 6.3 (1.0) 7.0 (1.2)
Mean (sd) FPG, mmol/mol 8.5 (4.2) 8.6 (3.1) 6.4 (1.4) 7.7 (3.1)
Tanner scale score, n (%)
1 0 0 0 0
2 0 1 (12.5) 0 1 (3.7)
3 1 (11.1) 1 (12.5) 1 (10.0) 3 (11.1)
4 2 (22.2) 4 (50.0) 1 (10.0) 7 (25.9)
5 6 (66.7) 2 (25.0) 8 (80.0) 16 (59.3)

SDS, standard deviation score; eGFR, estimated GFR; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.

a

*Mean baseline urinary glucose excretion in the 5‐mg dose group was based on the data of only eight participants, as the pre‐dose urine collection of one participant was incomplete.