Skip to main content
. 2018 May 6;35(8):1096–1104. doi: 10.1111/dme.13629

Table 3.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic characteristics of empagliflozin in the paediatric population in this trial and adults 13 with Type 2 diabetes after single‐dose empagliflozin administration

Population Empagliflozin dose, mg AUC0‐∞, nmol h/l AUC0‐24, nmol h/l Cmax, nmol/l tmax *, h t1/2, h fe0‐24, % CLR,0‐24, ml/min
Paediatric (n=8) 10 1450 (17.2) 1310 (18.9) 211 (59.1) 1.25 (0.97‐4.17) 7.61 (27.0) 18.4 (24.2) 52.2 (23.8)
Adults 13 (n =16) 10 1740 (16.4) 1550 (16.2) 309 (45.2) 1.50 (1.00‐2.50) 8.76 (13.0) 12.5 (24.0) 30.1 (25.1)
Paediatric (n =10) 25 5250 (27.6) 4720 (27.4) 692 (57.3) 1.78 (0.50‐4.00) 8.09 (26.8) 19.4 (15.4) 40.0 (26.9)
Adults 13 (n =16) 25 4340 (23.1) 3930 (22.9) 722 (20.0) 1.50 (0.75‐2.00) 8.24 (14.9) 13.3 (24.5) 32.4 (28.1)

AUC0‐∞, area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity; AUC0‐24, area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to 24 h post dose; CLR,0‐24, renal clearance of the analyte from time 0 to 24 h post dose; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; CV, arithmetic coefficient of variation; Fe0‐24, fraction of analyte eliminated in urine from time 0 to 24 h post dose; tmax, time from dosing until maximum observed concentration is reached in plasma; t1/2, terminal half‐life in plasma. For AUC0‐∞, AUC0‐24, Cmax, and t1/2, the arithmetic mean and %CV are given.

*For tmax, the median and range are given (instead of mean and %CV).