Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;48(4):410–422. doi: 10.1111/apt.14904

Table 3.

Microorganisms causing catheter‐related bloodstream infectionsa

2% taurolidine (n = 52) 0.9% saline (n = 50) P value
Infection type – no. of CRBSIs
Monobacterial bloodstream infection 3 14 0.21
Gram‐positive – % 3 (100) 6 (43)
Gram‐negative – % 0 (0) 8 (57)
Polybacterial bloodstream infectionb 1 1
Isolated fungemia 0 1
Unknownc 1 2
Total 5 18
Gram–positive – no. of microorganisms d
Bacillus cereus 0 1
Staphylococcus aureus 1 2
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1 4
Streptococcus salivarius 1 0
Species not specified 1 0
Total 4 7
Gram–negative – no. of microorganisms e
Acinetobacter ursingii 0 1
Citrobacter koseri 0 1
Klebsiella oxytoca 0 1
Klebsiella pneumonia 0 2
Morganella morganii 0 1
Neiserna elongate 1 0
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 0 1
Serratia marcescens 0 1
Species not specified 0 2
Total 1 10
Fungemia—no. of microorganisms
Candida albicans 0 1

CRBSI, catheter‐related bloodstream infection.

a

P value was calculated with the use of Fisher's exact test.

b

In the taurolidine and saline group, respectively two (Streptococcus salivarius and Neiserna elongata) and three (Acinetobacter ursingii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Staphylococcus epidermidis) microorganisms were grown from one blood culture.

c

A positive blood culture was reported; however, the microorganism involved was not documented.

d

Gram–positive species cultured from both monobacterial and polybacterial blood cultures.

e

Gram–negative species cultured from both monobacterial and polybacterial blood cultures.