Table 2.
The effect of the frog‐supportive shoes on hoof kinetics in the walk and trot T0 = the reference (control) value, T1 = immediately after application of the frog‐supportive shoes, T2 = 72 h after application of the frog‐supportive shoe. The data are presented as mean ± s.d., the StDur toe–heel index is presented as median ± IQR
| Time | TPVF (ms) | PVF (N/kg) | TPVF to lift off (ms) | StDur (ms) | VI (N s/kg) | StDur toe–heel index | Speed (m/s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walk | 0 | 410 ± 39 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 212. ± 25.1 | 629.5 ± 73.2 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 10.8 ± 5.8 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
| 1 | 416 ± 35 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 211 ± 24.4 | 629.8 ± 64.8 | 2.0 ± 0.4a | 10.8 ± 5.7 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | 417 ± 46 | 6.1 ± 0.9a , b | 213 ± 22.5 | 628.1 ± 62.5 | 2.6 ± 0.5a , b | 9.6 ± 4.7 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | |
| Trot | 0 | 128 ± 22 | 8.1 ± 1.7 | 151 ± 35.6 | 235.1 ± 30.9 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 5.5 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
| 1 | 127 ± 19 | 8.0 ± 1.7 | 152 ± 33.5 | 235.3 ± 25.8 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 12.3 ± 5.3 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | 122 ± 20 | 9.8 ± 1.6a , b | 151 ± 33.6 | 228.0 ± 29.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2a , b | 13.6 ± 5.4 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
a
Significant difference P<0.017 after Bonferonni correction compared with T0.
b
Significant difference P<0.017 after Bonferonni correction compared with T1.