Table 3.
The effect of the interaction between body condition score and the frog‐supportive shoes on hoof kinetics in the walk and trot T0 = the reference (control) value, T1 = immediately after application of the frog‐supportive shoes, T2 = 72 h after application of the frog‐supportive shoe. The data are presented as mean ± s.d., the StDur toe–heel index is presented as median ± IQR
| T | BCS | TPVF (ms) | PVF (N/kg) | TPVF to lift off (ms) | StDur (ms) | VI (N s/kg) | StD toe–heel index | Speed (m/s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walk | 0 | Normal | 435 ± 26 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 232 ± 10.2 | 690.2 ± 35.9 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 14.2 ± 5.8 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| 0 | Obese | 386 ± 35 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 192 ± 19.0a | 568.7 ± 42.7a | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 9.4 ± 3.6a | 1.2 ± 0.1a | |
| 1 | Normal | 435 ± 29 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 230 ± 9.8 | 681.2 ± 22.3 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 14.2 ± 6.4 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | |
| 1 | Obese | 398 ± 33 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 191 ± 17.6a | 578.5 ± 50.1a | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 9.5 ± 2.4a | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | Normal | 422 ± 53 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 228 ± 16.8 | 655.2 ± 55.2 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 12.5 ± 7.9 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | Obese | 412 ± 39 | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 199 ± 18.1a | 601.0 ± 59.7 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 9.1 ± 2.7a | 1.2 ± 0.0 | |
| Trot | 0 | Normal | 125 ± 21 | 8.6 ± 1.7 | 165 ± 34.8 | 240.4 ± 23.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 17.1 ± 4.4 | 2.8 ± 0.2 |
| 0 | Obese | 131 ± 25 | 7.5 ± 1.7 | 136 ± 31.7 | 229.8 ± 37.6 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 11.8 ± 2.1a | 2.9 ± 0.1 | |
| 1 | Normal | 130 ± 21 | 8.8 ± 1.5 | 165 ± 35.2 | 243.9 ± 21.6 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 6.5 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | |
| 1 | Obese | 125 ± 17 | 7.3 ± 1.6 | 140 ± 28.0 | 226.6 ± 27.8 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 11.2 ± 1.9a | 2.8 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | Normal | 123 ± 25 | 11.1 ± 1.1 | 164 ± 33.3 | 234.5 ± 30.7 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 15.6 ± 6.8 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | |
| 2 | Obese | 122 ± 14 | 8.5 ± 0.7a | 138 ± 29.8 | 221.5 ± 27.9 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 12.0 ± 3.0 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
a
Significant difference P<0.017 after Bonferonni correction compared with the normal group.