Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;113(9):1598–1608. doi: 10.1111/add.14228

Table 3.

Study 1: unadjusted and adjusted multi‐level regression model with serving size predicting observed alcohol consumption (UK units); participants are clustered in pairs (level 2).

Unadjusted (n = 114) Adjusted (n = 114)
B (SE) (95% CI) P B (SE) (95% CI) P
Fixed components
Intercept 3.87 (0.32) (3.23, 4.52) < 0.001 3.99 (0.48) (3.04, 4.95) < 0.001
Serving size condition (reference: standard) −0.80 (0.44) (−1.69, 0.09) 0.08 −1.33 (0.57) (−2.46, −0.20) 0.02
Gender (reference: sale) −1.31 (0.37) (−2.04, −0.58) 0.001
Serving size × gender 0.82 (0.55) (−0.28, 1.92) 0.14
AUDIT 0.07 (0.02) (0.02, 0.11) 0.003
TRI Restrict −0.02 (0.02) (−0.06, 0.03) 0.47
Random components
Level 2 variance (pairs) 2.48 (0.53) 1.84 (0.41)
Level 1 variance (participants) 0.63 (0.12) 0.57 (0.11)

AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. AUDIT scores range between 0 and 40. TRI = Temptation and Restraint Inventory. TRI Restrict scores range between 3 and 21. CI = confidence interval; SE = standard error.