Skip to main content
. 2018 May 14;113(9):1598–1608. doi: 10.1111/add.14228

Table 6.

Study 2: unadjusted and adjusted multi‐level regression model with serving size predicting observed alcohol consumption (UK units); participants are clustered in teams (level 2) and quiz nights (level 3).

Unadjusted (n = 164) Adjusted (n = 148)
B (SE) (BCa 95% CI) P B (SE) (BCa 95% CI) P
Fixed components
Intercept 2.88 (0.23) (2.41, 3.36) 0.001 1.59 (0.53) (0.43, 3.07) 0.004
Serving size condition (reference: standard) −1.14 (0.28) (−1.68, −0.60) 0.001 −0.73 (0.52) (−1.78, 0.27) 0.14
Gender (reference: male) −0.54 (0.57) (−1.59, 0.42) 0.35
Serving size × gender −0.31 (0.69) (−1.68, 1.05) 0.66
AUDIT‐C 0.30 (0.08) (0.14, 0.44) 0.001
Consumption before quiz 0.03 (0.10) (−0.12, 0.17) 0.73
Random components
Level 3 × 2 variance (quiz night × teams) 1.38 (0.37) 1.17 (0.37)
Level 1 variance (participants) 2.84 (0.35) 2.23 (0.28)

AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; AUDIT‐C scores range between 0 and 12. CI = confidence interval; SE = standard error; BCa = bias‐corrected and accelerated.