Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;9:1318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01318

Table 3.

Mean (SD) proportion of accuracy on 11 target structures in HL-Russian per group.

BB (N = 38) HL-weak (N = 37) SL-weak (N = 38) biSLI (N = 22) F-results η2-value
SVO 0.98 (0.08) 0.84 (0.18) 0.99 (0.04) 0.64 (0.29) 21.31∗∗ 0.36
SOV 0.72 (0.27) 0.43 (0.26) 0.58 (0.21) 0.19 (0.20) 23.79∗∗ 0.39
OVS 0.92 (0.17) 0.77 (0.26) 0.93 (0.11) 0.40 (0.33) 27.54∗∗ 0.42
Biclausal sentences with coordination 0.99 (0.06) 0.84 (0.24) 0.95 (0.10) 0.59 (0.40) 14.95∗∗ 0.29
Biclausal sentences with subordination 0.97 (0.08) 0.83 (0.31) 0.97 (0.08) 0.40 (0.38) 28.95∗∗ 0.44
Object questions 0.88 (0.18) 0.55 (0.29) 0.80 (0.21) 0.38 (0.32) 23.24∗∗ 0.38
Oblique questions 0.95 (0.12) 0.63 (0.33) 0.97 (0.08) 0.22 (0.29) 54.27∗∗ 0.59
Subject relatives 0.80 (0.18) 0.51 (0.28) 0.75 (0.22) 0.24 (0.31) 28.43∗∗ 0.43
Object relatives 0.57 (0.28) 0.23 (0.26) 0.57 (0.32) 0.13 (0.21) 20.07∗∗ 0.35
Real conditionals 0.96 (0.12) 0.70 (0.35) 0.93 (0.14) 0.55 (0.43) 12.66∗∗ 0.25
Unreal conditionals 0.61 (0.36) 0.16 (0.26) 0.63 (0.38) 0.03 (0.09) 28.87∗∗ 0.44

∗∗Significance at p < 0.001. BB, balanced bilinguals; HL-weak, bilinguals with the Weaker HL-Russian and the Dominant SL-Hebrew; SL-weak, bilinguals with the Weaker SL-Hebrew and Dominant HL-Russian; biSLI, bilinguals with SLI; SVO, Subject–Verb–Object; SOV, Subject–Object–Verb; OVS, Object–Verb–Subject.