Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;9:1318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01318

Table 5.

Mean (SD) proportion of accuracy on 11 target structures in SL- Hebrew per group.

BB (N = 38) HL-weak (N = 39) SL-weak (N = 18) biSLI (N = 22) F-results η2-value
SVO 0.98 (0.04) 0.96 (0.07) 0.94 (0.13) 0.70 (0.26) 25.59∗∗ 0.41
Biclausal sentences with coordination) 0.90 (0.15) 0.93 (0.17) 0.74 (0.33) 0.48 (0.41) 17.73∗∗ 0.32
Biclausal sentences with subordination 0.97 (0.10) 0.96 (0.12) 0.83 (0.26) 0.47 (0.40) 29.15∗∗ 0.44
Object questions 0.83 (0.25) 0.79 (0.25) 0.54 (0.29) 0.27 (0.27) 26.58∗∗ 0.41
Oblique questions 0.91 (0.18) 0.83 (0.25) 0.67 (0.33) 0.14 (0.24) 54.41∗∗ 0.59
Object relatives 0.93 (0.16) 0.93 (0.15) 0.85 (0.24) 0.45 (0.39) 23.88∗∗ 0.39
Oblique relatives 0.94 (0.15) 0.96 (0.11) 0.72 (0.30) 0.35 (0.37) 42.56∗∗ 0.53
VSO 0.88 (0.18) 0.83 (0.20) 0.69 (0.21) 0.41 (0.30) 24.27∗∗ 0.39
Real conditionals 0.95 (0.10) 0.91 (0.15) 0.74 (0.25) 0.45 (0.33) 33.54∗∗ 0.47
Unreal conditionals 0.76 (0.24) 0.68 (0.31) 0.35 (0.34) 0.16 (0.27) 25.57∗∗ 0.40
Biclausal sentences with phrasal conjunctions 0.72 (0.28) 0.73 (0.27) 0.37 (0.31) 0.09 (0.12) 37.10∗∗ 0.50

∗∗Significance at p < 0.001.

BB, Balanced bilinguals; HL-weak, bilinguals with the Weaker HL-Russian and the Dominant SL-Hebrew; SL-weak, bilinguals with the Weaker SL-Hebrew and Dominant HL-Russian; biSLI, bilinguals with SLI; SVO, Subject–Verb–Object; VSO, Verb–Subject–Object.