Table 2.

Genetic diversity of Scophthalmus maximus throughout its geographical distribution

Pop code	Sample size	Na	HE	HE (P95)	P99 (%)	F IS	Ne
BAS‐N	33	1.45	0.088	0.198	45	0.162	730
BAS‐S	45	1.45	0.081	0.182	45	0.201	Infinite
T	38	1.55	0.092	0.166	55	0.122	796
NOR	19	1.47	0.098	0.210	47	0.066	Infinite
NS‐E	47	1.59	0.097	0.165	59	0.095	Infinite
NS‐C	46	1.59	0.095	0.160	59	0.084	Infinite
NS‐S	24	1.49	0.092	0.189	49	0.099	1468
ICE	13	1.38	0.092	0.243	38	0.153	Infinite
IR‐W	47	1.57	0.094	0.163	57	0.126	624
IR‐E	45	1.58	0.094	0.163	58	0.129	264
IR‐SW	22	1.49	0.093	0.192	49	0.103	Infinite
IR‐SE	20	1.48	0.097	0.204	48	0.055	Infinite
ECH	18	1.46	0.096	0.208	46	0.109	Infinite
BB‐FR	25	1.50	0.095	0.189	50	0.059	1813
BB‐SE	48	1.59	0.093	0.157	59	0.099	1733
BB‐SW	41	1.55	0.092	0.168	55	0.158	166
SP‐W	49	1.60	0.096	0.161	60	0.063	411
AD	37	1.43	0.087	0.203	43	0.083	46
BLS‐N	25	1.28	0.073	0.265	28	0.138	126
BLS‐S	30	1.31	0.078	0.257	31	0.069	489
	672	1.49	0.093	0.189	49	0.109

A, mean number of alleles per locus; H_E, expected heterozygosity; P₉₅, percent of polymorphic loci (minimum allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.05); Ho, observed heterozygosity; HE (P₉₅), expected heterozygosity calculated using polymorphic loci at P₉₅; F _IS, inbreeding coefficient; Ne, effective population size considering a lowest allele frequency of 0.02; in bold, F _IS p < .05; in bold and underlined, significant F _IS values after sequential Bonferroni correction (p < .0001).