Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;23(6):1372. doi: 10.3390/molecules23061372

Table 2.

Oenological parameters of Chardonnay grape juices and base wines at different grape berry maturity levels.

Parameters S1 CH 2015 S2 CH 2015 S1 CH 2016
Grape Juice Base Wine Grape Juice Base Wine Grape Juice Base Wine
I (29/08) II (07/09) III (17/09) I II III I (29/08) II (07/09) III (17/09) I II III I/II (13/09) III (26/09) I/II III
pH 2.78 ± 0.1 2.78 ± 0.1 2.81 ± 0.1 2.64 ± 0.01 2.64 ± 0.00 2.80 ± 0.00 2.80 ± 0.1 2.80 ± 0.1 2.88 ± 0.1 2.64 ± 0.00 2.71 ± 0.03 2.84 ± 0.00 2.86 ± 0.03 2.93 ± 0.01 2.70 ± 0.06 2.81 ± 0.01
TA (g/L H2SO4) 9.9 ± 0.0 9.3 ± 0.0 7.4 ± 0.0 9.5 ± 0.0 8.9 ± 0.0 7.5 ± 0.1 9.3 ± 0.0 8.4 ± 0.0 6.9 ± 0.0 9.0 ± 0.0 8.4 ± 0.0 7.2 ± 0.1 9.9 ± 0.6 6.8 ± 0.2 9.8 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 0.1
MA (g/L) 8.3 ± 0.3 7.0 ± 0.3 5.2 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 0.2 5.8 ± 0.0 4.3 ± 0.0 7.7 ± 0.3 6.7 ± 0.3 5.0 ± 0.2 6.1 ± 0.0 5.5 ± 0.0 4.1 ± 0.0 9.2 ± 0.7 3.9 ± 0.3 7.0 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.1
TartA (g/L) 8.2 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 0.1 6.1 ± 0.5 8.1 ± 0.3 8.1 ± 0.3 8.4 ± 0.3 5.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.0 5.6 ± 0.0 9.4 ± 0.1 7.9 ± 0.1 6.8 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 0.2
Sugars (g/L) 134.5 ± 0.5 157.8 ± 0.5 167.8 ± 0.5 - - - 135.0 ± 0.5 157.3 ± 0.5 170.6 ± 0.5 - - - 154.8 ± 4.5 186.8 ± 1.6 - -
PAC (% v/v) 8.0 ± 0.0 9.4 ± 0.0 10.0 ± 0.0 - - - 8.0 ± 0.0 9.4 ± 0.0 10.1 ± 0.0 - - - 9.1 ± 0.2 11.1 ± 0.1 - -
Grape berry MD 14 17 23 - - - 15 19 25 - - - 16 28 - -
K+ (mg/L) 868 ± 62 838 ± 60 891 ± 64 427 ± 8 458 ± 7 524 ± 30 854 ± 61 879 ± 63 932 ± 67 402 ± 3 482 ± 13 540 ± 18 1160 ± 15 - 441 ± 51 354 ± 59
Ca++ (mg/L) 126 ± 4 108 ± 3 89 ± 3 99 ± 0 81 ± 1 82 ± 1 124 ± 4 94 ± 3 86 ± 3 99 ± 2 80 ± 3 77 ± 3 112 ± 6 - 110 ± 6 108 ± 7
YAN (mg/L) 139 ± 3 79 ± 2 177 ± 4 - - - 134 ± 3 93 ± 2 185 ± 4 - - - 218 ± 16 131 ± 21 - -
NH₄⁺ (mg/L) 53 ± 1 24 ± 0 71 ± 1 - - - 53 ± 1 29 ± 0 69 ± 1 - - - 128 ± 12 82 ± 10 - -
α-NH2 (mg/L) 86 ± 1 55 ± 1 106 ± 2 12 ± 0 12 ± 0 16 ± 1 81 ± 1 65 ± 1 116 ± 2 11 ± 0 12 ± 0 16 ± 1 71 ± 2 49 ± 12 11 ± 1 9 ± 1
Prot content by Bradford (mg/L eq. BSA) - - - 7.6 ± 0.8 6.9 ± 0.1 10.1 ± 0.8 - - - 5.3 ± 0.4 5.8 ± 0.5 9.2 ± 0.4 - - 3.4 ± 0.1 5.3 ± 0.2
Prot content by SDS–PAGE (mg/L eq. 50 kDa marker) - - - 11.25 ± 0.86 10.69 ± 1.14 14.70 ± 0.56 - - - 10.25 ± 0.50 11.26 ± 0.58 16.44 ± 0.92 - - 13.56 ± 0.07 14.59 ± 0.57
Gluconic acid (mg/L) - - - 13 ± 2 9 ± 1 8 ± 1 - - - 12 ± 1 9 ± 1 9 ± 1 - - 17 ± 4 12 ± 1
Alcohol (% v/v) - - - 10.5 ± 0.0 11.1 ± 0.0 11.0 ± 0.1 - - - 10.6 ± 0.0 11.1 ± 0.0 11.1 ± 0.1 - - 11.0 ± 0.1 11.1 ± 0.1

TA: total acidity. MD: maturity degree, as the ratio of sugars to TA. PAC: the potential alcohol content of grape berries. MA: malic acid. TartA: tartaric acid. K+: potassium. Ca++: calcium. YAN: assimilable nitrogen content. NH4⁺: ammonium nitrogen. α-NH2: α-amino nitrogen. Prot: protein. SDS–PAGE: sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. S1 and S2: squeeze 1 and squeeze 2. CH: Chardonnay. I, II, III: maturity levels. All data are given by the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate (2015) or triplicate (2016).