Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 7;23(6):1376. doi: 10.3390/molecules23061376

Table 1.

Results of selected optimal spectral subintervals for prediction of SH and SS in in the ultrasound treatment process.

Parameters Number of Subintervals Selected Subintervals PCs Rc RMSEC Rp RMSEP
SH (μmol/g) 15 [4, 5, 6, 14] 10 0.9302 0.39 0.7930 0.76
16 [4, 5, 13, 15] 9 0.9325 0.38 0.7162 0.94
17 [1, 4, 7] 4 0.9226 0.40 0.8514 0.58
18 [1, 4, 11] 5 0.9200 0.41 0.8662 0.57
19 [1, 3, 5] 5 0.9192 0.41 0.8188 0.63
20 [1, 5, 8, 17] 10 0.9405 0.36 0.8488 0.64
21 [4, 5, 13] 6 0.9348 0.37 0.8930 0.53
22 [4, 9, 19] 10 0.9334 0.38 0.7773 0.91
23 [5, 7, 18, 21] 10 0.9381 0.37 0.7410 0.95
24 [2, 6, 9] 8 0.9344 0.37 0.8021 0.66
25 [2, 4, 6, 7] 7 0.9331 0.37 0.8441 0.60
26 [2, 4, 8, 23] 10 0.9512 0.32 0.7423 0.93
27 [2, 4, 8, 24] 10 0.9512 0.33 0.7423 0.93
28 [2, 5, 10, 25] 10 0.9366 0.37 0.8122 0.76
29 [2, 5, 7] 9 0.9380 0.36 0.8126 0.66
30 [2, 6, 11, 25] 10 0.9447 0.35 0.7615 0.93
SS (μmol/g) 15 [1, 3, 8, 10] 9 0.6298 8.28 0.6236 7.40
16 [2, 3, 6, 7] 6 0.6087 8.17 0.4910 8.17
17 [9, 10, 11, 16] 2 0.5667 7.52 0.6756 9.16
18 [14, 17, 18] 7 0.6153 7.40 0.5898 9.47
19 [4, 10, 22, 27] 10 0.8056 5.52 0.5266 12.10
20 [1, 2, 5] 5 0.5571 8.25 0.4175 8.53
21 [7, 14, 18] 7 0.6481 6.99 0.4884 10.60
22 [9, 10, 20] 2 0.5833 7.40 0.6731 7.95
23 [8, 17, 18, 21] 10 0.7238 6.38 0.4840 11.40
24 [8, 10, 11, 20] 10 0.4842 9.56 0.5399 9.33
25 [8, 15, 18] 8 0.6665 6.83 0.3248 12.60
26 [2, 9, 20, 22] 10 0.7045 6.54 0.5664 9.91
27 [2, 7, 24] 8 0.6952 6.63 0.5358 9.53
28 [2, 14, 7, 26] 9 0.6505 7.01 0.6660 7.90
29 [10, 17, 27] 7 0.6683 6.72 0.6123 8.30
30 [10, 17, 28] 7 0.6489 6.91 0.6186 8.25