Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0200672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200672

Table 1. Log-Linear Analyses (multi-way contingency tabulations) for all species combined (A) and each species separately (B-E) comparing the cumulative number of trays foraged to unforaged ones as the measure of comparison.

Var 1 Var 2 G2 Df P-Value
Table 1A Log-Linear Analysis Combining All Small Mammals
Species 9.46 3 0.024
Snake Treatment 40.28 2 <0.001
Snake Treatment Species 80.76 17 <0.001
Species (Snake Treatment) 32.48 9 0.002
Table 1B. Log-Linear Analysis for Pocket Mice (C. penicillatus)
Snake Treatment 31.4 2 <0.001
Sequence 0.02 1 0.888
Snake Treatment (Sequence) 33.22 4 <0.001
Table 1B. Log-Linear Analysis for Kangaroo Rats (D. merriami)
Snake Treatment 16.58 2 0.003
Sequence 0.02 1 0.99
Snake Treatment (Sequence) 19.72 4 0.001
Table 1C. Log-Linear Analysis for Allenby’s Gerbils (G.a. allenbyi)
Snake Treatment 18 2 0.001
Sequence 0 1 1
Snake Treatment (Sequence) 18.9 4 0.001
Table 1D. Log-Linear Analysis for Greater Egyptian Gerbils (G. pyramidum)
Snake Treatment 5.34 2 0.07
Sequence 0.02 1 0.99
Snake Treatment (Sequence) 11.6 4 0.021

Variables: Species (GA, GP, CP, DM), Snake Treatment (Horned-Viper, Sidewinder, Control), Sequence (Pre-, Post-Exposure) Abbreviations: G2 –chi-squared test statistic for log-linear method, df—degrees of freedom, P-value—probability of a false positive.