Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;44(5):1159–1165. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby068

Table 2.

Total, direct, and conditional indirect effects of best fitting (simple) multilevel moderated mediation models of stress, negative affect, threat anticipation, aberrant salience, and psychotic experiencesa

FEP ARMS Controls
adj. B (95% CI) P adj. B (95% CI) P adj. B (95% CI) P
Pathways via affective disturbance 
Event-related stress, negative affect, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Event-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.007 (-0.018 – 0.033) 0.558 -0.002 (-0.037 – 0.032) 0.900 0.002 (-0.013 – 0.018) 0.789
  Indirect effectb (Event-related stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences) 0.035 (0.011 – 0.065) 0.011 0.053 (0.035 – 0.074) <0.001 0.026 (0.015 – 0.039) <0.001
  Total effect 0.042 (0.002 – 0.083) 0.040 0.050 (0.016 – 0.085) 0.005 0.028 (0.005 – 0.050) 0.016
 Activity-related stress, negative affect, and psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Activity-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.053 (0.027 – 0.079) <0.001 0.061 (0.028 – 0.093) <0.001 0.015 (-0.008 – 0.037) 0.198
  Indirect effectb (Activity-related stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences) 0.085 (0.055 – 0.122) <0.001 0.100 (0.066 – 0.138) <0.001 0.055 (0.037 – 0.077) <0.001
  Total effect 0.138 (0.097 – 0.180) <0.001 0.161 (0.116 – 0.206) <0.001 0.070 (0.034 – 0.106) <0.001
 Social stress, negative affect, and psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Social stress → psychotic experiences) -0.017 (-0.046 – 0.013) 0.262 0.024 (0.001 – 0.046) 0.039 0.012 (-0.005 – 0.029) 0.155
  Indirect effectb (Social stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences) 0.052 (0.029 – 0.079) <0.001 0.070 (0.044 – 0.100) <0.001 0.048 (0.031 – 0.068) <0.001
  Total effect 0.035 (-0.009 – 0.078) 0.115 0.094 (0.060 – 0.127) <0.001 0.060 (0.030 – 0.089) <0.001
Pathways via aberrant salience
 Event-related stress, aberrant salience, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Event-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.058 (0.020 – 0.095) 0.003 0.055 (0.023 – 0.087) <0.001 0.030 (0.007 – 0.053) 0.010
  Indirect effectb (Event-related stress → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences) -0.015 (-0.027 – -0.004) 0.011 -0.005 (-0.017 – 0.004) 0.363 -0.002 (-0.006 – 0.002) 0.363
  Total effect 0.043 (0.002 – 0.083) 0.038 0.050 (0.015 – 0.085) 0.005 0.028 (0.005 – 0.050) 0.015
 Activity-related stress, aberrant salience, psychotic experiences‡
 Social stress, aberrant salience, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Social stress → psychotic experiences) 0.038 (-0.004 – 0.080) 0.075 0.094 (0.064 – 0.124) <0.001 0.061 (0.033 – 0.088) <0.001
  Indirect effectb (Social stress → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences) -0.003 (-0.015 – 0.008) 0.541 -0.001 (-0.011 – 0.013) 0.891 -0.001 (-0.005 – 0.006) 0.793
  Total effect 0.035 (-0.009 – 0.078) 0.115 0.094 (0.060 – 0.127) <0.001 0.060 (0.030 – 0.089) <0.001
 Negative affect, aberrant salience, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Negative affect → psychotic experiences)
  Indirect effectb (Negative affect→ aberrant salience → psychotic experiences) 0.026 (-0.001 – 0.046) 0.095 0.017 (-0.012 – 0.049) 0.443 0.017 (-0.004 – 0.030) 0.220
  Total effect 0.187 (0.114 – 0.346) <0.001 0.237 (0.128 – 0.346) <0.001 0.173 (0.096 – 0.251) <0.001
 Threat anticipation, aberrant salience, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.144 (0.092 – 0.196) <0.001 0.117 (0.073 – 0.161) <0.001 0.091 (0.058 – 0.124) <0.001
  Indirect effectb (Threat anticipation → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences) 0.004 (-0.008 – 0.022) 0.563 0.002 (-0.009 – 0.017) 0.813 0.008 (0.000 – 0.021) 0.124
  Total effect 0.148 (0.089 – 0.208) <0.001 0.119 (0.070 – 0.167) <0.001 0.099 (0.062 – 0.137) <0.001
Pathways via threat anticipation
 Event-related stress, threat anticipation, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Event-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.029 (-0.005 – 0.064) 0.093 0.034 (0.002 – 0.066) 0.036 0.020 (0.000 – 0.039) 0.047
  Indirect effectb (Event-related stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.013 (0.003 – 0.027) 0.034 0.016 (0.007 – 0.027) 0.003 0.008 (0.003 – 0.015) 0.008
  Total effect 0.042 (0.002 – 0.083) 0.038 0.050 (0.015 – 0.084) 0.005 0.028 (0.005 – 0.050) 0.015
 Activity-related stress, threat anticipation, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Activity-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.113 (0.078 – 0.148) <0.001 0.136 (0.098 – 0.175) <0.001 0.055 (0.025 – 0.085) <0.001
  Indirect effectb (Activity-related stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.025 (0.011 – 0.043) 0.003 0.024 (0.011 – 0.039) <0.001 0.015 (0.007 – 0.024) <0.001
  Total effect 0.138 (0.078 – 0.148) <0.001 0.160 (0.098 – 0.175) <0.001 0.070 (0.025 – 0.085) <0.001
 Social stress, threat anticipation, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Social stress → psychotic experiences) 0.020 (-0.019 – 0.059) 0.320 0.075 (0.045 – 0.104) <0.001 0.050 (0.026 – 0.075) <0.001
  Indirect effectb (Social stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.015 (0.003 – 0.031) 0.043 0.018 (0.008 – 0.031) 0.001 0.009 (0.003 – 0.017) 0.008
  Total effect 0.034 (-0.009 – 0.078) 0.118 0.093 (0.059 – 0.127) <0.001 0.059 (0.030 – 0.089) <0.001
 Negative affect, threat anticipation, psychotic experiences
  Direct effect (Negative affect → psychotic experiences) 0.315 (0.239 – 0.391) 0.000 0.324 (0.235 – 0.412) 0.000 0.252 (0.188 – 0.316) 0.000
  Indirect effectb (Negative affect → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.030 (0.014 – 0.053) 0.002 0.015 (-0.001 – 0.033) 0.072 0.019 (0.009 – 0.031) 0.001
  Total effect 0.345 (0.257 – 0.433) 0.000 0.339 (0.250 – 0.428) 0.000 0.271 (0.199 – 0.343) 0.000

Note: FEP, First-Episode Psychosis; ARMS, At-Risk Mental State for psychosis; vs., versus; CI, confidence interval;

aAdjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, employment status.

bDifference in indirect effects across groups (Δ indirect effects)

‡Model estimation did not terminate normally