Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;44(5):1159–1165. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby068

Table 3.

Total, direct, and conditional indirect effects of multiple multilevel moderated mediation models of stress on psychotic experiences via negative affect, threat anticipation and aberrant saliencea

FEP ARMS Controls
adj. B (95% CI) P adj. B (95% CI) P adj. B (95% CI) P
Event-related stress
 Direct effect (Event-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.015 (-0.008 – 0.038) 0.192 -0.005 (-0.030 – 0.021) 0.731 0.000 (-0.013 – 0.013) 0.965
 Total indirect effect (Event-related stress) 0.005 (-0.010 – 0.021) 0.574 0.012 (-0.005 – 0.027) 0.124 0.008 (0.001 – 0.016) 0.030
 Specific indirect effectsb
  Event-related stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences 0.012 (0.001 – 0.025) 0.049 0.017 (0.007 – 0.027) 0.001 0.008 (0.003 – 0.014) 0.002
  Event-related stress → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences -0.012 (-0.023 – -0.004) 0.009 -0.006 (-0.017 – 0.002) 0.207 -0.002 (-0.006 – 0.001) 0.278
  Event-related stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.005 (-0.000 – 0.010) 0.072 0.001 (-0.001– 0.004) 0.236 0.002 (-0.000 – 0.003) 0.073
  Event-related stress → negative affect → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.000 (-0.000 – 0.001) 0.092 0.000 (-0.000 – 0.001) 0.222 0.000 (0.000 – 0.000) 0.036
 Total effect (Event-related stress) 0.020 (-0.010 – 0.050) 0.194 0.008 (-0.021 – 0.037) 0.602 0.008 (-0.007 – 0.023) 0.312
Activity-related stress
 Direct effect (Activity-related stress → psychotic experiences) 0.051 (0.021 – 0.081) 0.001 0.034 (0.007 – 0.060) 0.014 0.004 (-0.015 – 0.022) 0.708
 Total indirect effect (Activity-related stress) 0.058 (0.037 – 0.081) 0.000 0.061 (0.040 – 0.084) 0.000 0.034 (0.022 – 0.048) 0.000
 Specific indirect effectsb
  Activity-related stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences 0.046 (0.030 – 0.064) <0.001 0.047 (0.033 – 0.062) <0.001 0.029 (0.020 – 0.039) <0.001
  Activity-related stress → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences -0.001 (-0.010 – 0.010) 0.896 0.009 (-0.004 – 0.025) 0.219 0.000 (-0.004 – 0.005) 0.949
  Activity-related stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.011 (0.005 – 0.017) <0.001 0.004 (-0.002 – 0.010) 0.191 0.005 (0.002 – 0.008) 0.004
  Activity-related stress → negative affect → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.002 (0.001 – 0.003) 0.003 0.001 (-0.000 – 0.001) 0.201 0.001 (0.000 – 0.001) 0.007
 Total effect (Activity-related stress) 0.109 (0.075 – 0.142) 0.000 0.094 (0.061 – 0.128) 0.000 0.038 (0.012 – 0.063) 0.003
Social stress
 Direct effect (Social stress → psychotic experiences) -0.029 (-0.058 – -0.001) 0.044 0.001 (-0.021 – 0.022) 0.962 -0.001 (-0.014 – 0.012) 0.844
 Total indirect effect (Social stress) 0.018 (0.004 – 0.031) 0.010 0.013 (-0.004 – 0.031) 0.136 0.019 (0.009 – 0.030) 0.000
 Specific indirect effectsb
  Social stress → negative affect → psychotic experiences 0.017 (0.008 – 0.028) 0.001 0.018 (0.006 – 0.032) 0.006 0.021 (0.013 – 0.031) <0.001
  Social stress → aberrant salience → psychotic experiences -0.003 (-0.014 – 0.005) 0.466 -0.006 (-0.016 – 0.004) 0.239 -0.004 (-0.009 – 0.001) 0.129
  Social stress → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.003 (-0.002 – 0.008) 0.220 0.001 (-0.000 – 0.004) 0.285 0.001 (-0.000 – 0.002) 0.326
  Social stress → negative affect → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.001 (0.000 – 0.001) 0.009 0.000 (-0.000 – 0.001) 0.201 0.000 (0.000 – 0.001) 0.013
 Total effect (Social stress) -0.012 (-0.044 – 0.021) 0.481 0.014 (-0.013 – 0.041) 0.318 0.018 (0.003 – 0.032) 0.017
Negative affect
 Direct effect 0.255 (0.197 – 0.314) 0.000 0.260 (0.192 – 0.327) 0.000 0.220 (0.173 – 0.267) 0.000
 Total indirect effect
  Negative affect → threat anticipation → psychotic experiences 0.009 (0.004 – 0.015) 0.002 0.003 (−0.001 – 0.007) 0.188 0.004 (0.002 – 0.007) 0.002
 Total effect (Negative affect) 0.264 (0.203 – 0.325) 0.000 0.263 (0.196 – 0.329) 0.000 0.224 (0.176 – 0.271) 0.000
Threat anticipation
 Direct effect (Threat anticipation → psychotic experiences) 0.075 (0.044 – 0.106) 0.000 0.019 (-0.009 – 0.046) 0.184 0.033 (0.014 – 0.052) 0.001
Aberrant salience
 Direct effect (Aberrant salience → psychotic experiences) 0.156 (0.105 – 0.207) 0.000 0.210 (0.142 – 0.278) 0.000 0.134 (0.086 – 0.183) 0.000

Note: Overview of total, direct, and indirect effects of significant paths from simple moderated multilevel mediation models (see table 2). FEP, First-Episode Psychosis; ARMS, At-Risk Mental State for psychosis; vs., versus; CI, confidence interval; correlated mediators, r (negative affect, aberrant salience) =-0.02, P=0.667, r (aberrant salience, threat anticipation) =0.34, P=0.001.

aAdjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, employment status, area-related stress and outsider statusb Difference in specific indirect effects across groups (Δ indirect effects):