Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;5(8):ofy178. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy178

Table 3.

Prevalence of TDR Associated With Patient Characteristics, With Absolute Differences in TDR Prevalence Estimated With Binomial Regression Using an Identity Link

Patient Characteristic TDR, No. (%) No TDR, No. (%) Prevalence Difference (95% CI), %
Sex
 Male, MSM 108 (14) 671 (86) Ref
 Male, not MSM 28 (9) 269 (91) –4.4 (–8.6 to –0.3)a
 Female 44 (10) 403 (90) –4.0 (–7.7 to –0.3)a
Age, y
 <20 13 (23) 43 (77) Ref
 20–29 52 (11) 421 (89) –12.2 (–23.6 to –0.8)a
 30–39 61 (13) 395 (87) –9.8 (–21.3 to 1.7)
 40–49 47 (11) 392 (89) –12.5 (–23.9 to –1.1)a
 ≥50 26 (11) 208 (89) –12.1 (–23.9 to –0.3)a
Race
 White 68 (15) 386 (85) Ref
 Black 113 (11) 911 (89) –3.9 (–7.7 to –0.1)a
 Hispanic or other 18 (10) 162 (90) –5.0 (–10.5 to 0.5)
Transmission cluster
 In cluster 149 (14) 935 (86) 5.0 (1.9 to 8.1)a
 Not in cluster 50 (9) 524 (91) Ref
Median CD4 cell count (IQR) 331 (147–505) 277 (72–459) 0.7 (0.04 to 1.4)a per 100 cells/mm3
Median log10 viral load (IQR) 4.79 (4.13–5.22) 4.81 (4.16–5.32) –1.3 (–3.2 to 0.6) per log10 copies/mL

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; MSM, men who have sex with men; TDR, transmitted drug resistance.

a P < .05.