Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 20;4:27. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0082-6

Table 1.

Studies included in this analysis of the Recurrence Score assay in node-positive breast cancer (N = 9055)

Studya Years of study enrollmentb Type of study N Study design Primary endpoint(s) Years of follow-up
SWOG S8814[18] 1989–1995 Prospective-retrospective; validation 367 (62%/38% 1–3N+/≥4N+) TAM vs. CAF→T DFS BCSS 10 years
transATAC[16] 1996–2000 Prospective-retrospective; validation 306 (79%/21% 1–3N+/≥4N+) ANA vs. TAM vs. ANA + TAM DR 9 years
SEER[27,28] 2004–2013 Prospective outcomes 6768 (42%/54%/4% N1mi/1–3N+/≥4N+) Population-based registry BCSS 5 years
Clalit[29] 2006–2011 Prospective outcomes 709
(42%/58% N1mi/1–3N+)
Population-based registry DR; BCSM 5 years
WSG PlanB[2326] 2009–2011 Prospective outcomes 905 (100% 1–3N+) RS <12: ET
RS ≥12: CT
DFS; DDFS 5 years

ANA anastrozole, BCSM breast cancer-specific mortality, BCSS breast cancer-specific survival, CAF cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, CT chemotherapy, DDFS distant disease-free survival, DFS disease-free survival, DR distant recurrence, ET endocrine therapy, T or TAM tamoxifen

aNumbers in brackets denote reference citations

bFor prospective-retrospective studies, this refers to the time period when the parent study enrolled patients