Table 1: Change in hardness (AVHN) of the restorative materials in various immersion media
| Conventional hybrid | Nanocomposite | Compomer | Nano-ionomer | Enamel | |||||||
| Coke | –41.1 ± 14.9a | –69.7 ± 30.6 | –94.4 ± 39.4 | –126.5 ± 43.1b | –176.7 ± 52.7c | ||||||
| Pulpy Orange | –31.3 ± 11.6 | –65 ± 51.5 | –90.7 ± 166.3 | –96.3 ± 33.5 | –154 ± 45.8 | ||||||
| Yakult | –27.8 ± 8.2a | –40.6 ± 10.4 | –82.3 ± 14.8 | –85.7 ± 17.7 b | –121.8 ± 40.7c | ||||||
| Rasna | –32.4 ± 3.1 | –64.4 ± 11.3 | –92.3 ± 34.4 | –95.3 ± 20.2 | –137.2 ± 41.5 | ||||||
| Total | –33.2 ± 11.1 | –59.9 ± 31.9 | –90 ± 84.2 | –100.9 ± 33.1 | –147.4 ± 48.3 |
a, b, c—difference is significant between the same alphabet groups; (–) sign depicts decrease in microhardness