Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;11(3):155–160. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1503

Table 1: Change in hardness (AVHN) of the restorative materials in various immersion media

   Conventional hybrid    Nanocomposite    Compomer    Nano-ionomer    Enamel   
Coke    –41.1 ± 14.9a    –69.7 ± 30.6    –94.4 ± 39.4    –126.5 ± 43.1b    –176.7 ± 52.7c   
Pulpy Orange    –31.3 ± 11.6    –65 ± 51.5    –90.7 ± 166.3    –96.3 ± 33.5    –154 ± 45.8   
Yakult    –27.8 ± 8.2a    –40.6 ± 10.4    –82.3 ± 14.8    –85.7 ± 17.7 b    –121.8 ± 40.7c   
Rasna    –32.4 ± 3.1    –64.4 ± 11.3    –92.3 ± 34.4    –95.3 ± 20.2    –137.2 ± 41.5   
Total    –33.2 ± 11.1    –59.9 ± 31.9    –90 ± 84.2    –100.9 ± 33.1    –147.4 ± 48.3   

a, b, c—difference is significant between the same alphabet groups; (–) sign depicts decrease in microhardness