Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;13(8):2211–2219. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00377

Table 1. Interaction Energies and Average Distances Measured with Molecular Dynamics Simulationsa.

MD simulation data RSL-wt RSL[4FW] RSL[5FW] RSL[7FW]
ΔG(TOT)calcb –11.2 –10.2 –10.2 –11.2
Gexp)c (−8.1) (−7.9) (−8.3) (−8.1)
ΔG(Trp31)calc –5.0 –4.4 –4.7 –4.4
ΔG(Trp36)calc –3.5 –3.6 –3.6 –3.8
d(H5···Trp31.CZ2)d 2.84 ± 0.25 2.94 ± 0.32 2.85 ± 0.27 2.93 ± 0.29
d(O3···Trp36.NHE1)d 1.95 ± 0.14 1.95 ± 0.14 1.95 ± 0.15 1.92 ± 0.14
d(HO4···Glu73.OE2)d 1.80 ± 0.19 1.78 ± 0.17 1.78 ± 0.18 1.94 ± 0.32
a

All energies are in kcal mol–1.

b

Calculated binding free energies.

c

Data measured by ITC in this work.

d

Distances in Å; time-averaged values and standard deviations were computed over all binding sites of each trimer.