Table 2.
pH (1:2.5 w/v H2O) | Total organic C mg g−1 |
Total N mg kg−1 |
Available P mg kg−1 |
Available K mg kg−1 |
Available Mg mg kg−1 |
Sand 2.00–0.063 mm % w/w |
Silt 0.063–0.002 mm % w/w |
Clay <0.002 mm % w/w |
Textural Class† (UK) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dessert orchard, tree row | ||||||||||
Block 1 | 8.1 | 46.5 | 2.0 | 47.0 | 741 | 98 | 35 | 34 | 31 | CL |
Block 2 | 8.1 | 36.1 | 1.7 | 51.4 | 706 | 101 | 37 | 31 | 32 | CL |
Block 3 | 7.9 | 37.2 | 1.8 | 56.4 | 749 | 111 | 36 | 31 | 33 | CL |
Dessert orchard, aisle | ||||||||||
Block 1 | 7.9 | 54.9 | 2.8 | 29.6 | 488 | 76 | 36 | 31 | 33 | CL |
Block 2 | 7.8 | 48.9 | 2.7 | 30.2 | 463 | 60 | 36 | 31 | 33 | CL |
Block 3 | 7.9 | 41.2 | 2.2 | 27.8 | 405 | 55 | 37 | 30 | 33 | CL |
Cider orchard, tree row | ||||||||||
Block 1 | 5.8 | 18.8 | 2.1 | 13.9 | 243 | 207 | 15 | 55 | 30 | ZCL |
Block 2 | 5.4 | 14.7 | 1.7 | 5.6 | 133 | 142 | 37 | 41 | 22 | CL |
Block 3 | 5.4 | 19.4 | 2.1 | 18.3 | 232 | 140 | 20 | 52 | 28 | ZCL |
Cider orchard, aisle | ||||||||||
Block 1 | 5.8 | 20.8 | 2.2 | 10.0 | 201 | 227 | 18 | 53 | 29 | ZCL |
Block 2 | 5.7 | 16.2 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 96 | 153 | 22 | 50 | 28 | CL |
Block 3 | 5.8 | 20.0 | 2.2 | 5.9 | 157 | 206 | 15 | 55 | 30 | ZCL |
P values from two-way analysis of variance | ||||||||||
Vegetation | 0.681 | 0.116 | 0.011 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.825 | 0.467 | 0.676 | 0.226 | |
Orchard | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.243 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.006 | |
Interaction | 0.034 | 0.241 | 0.053 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.055 | 0.415 | 0.342 | 0.614 |
Values are based on a single homogenisation of 24 subsamples.
CL = clay loam and ZCL = silty clay loam texture, based on the UK soil texture triangle (Avery, 1973).