Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;53(3):177–187. doi: 10.1177/0018578717737430

Table 2.

Knowledge of ADR Reporting Among Health Care Professionals in HFSUH, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia, From February to March 2015.

Variables Profession
Total
295 (%)
Pearson chi-square P value
Nurses
230 (%)
Physicians
44 (%)
Pharmacists
21 (%)
Do you think that ADR is the same with side effect?
 Yes 83 (36.1) 15 (34.1) 1 99 (33.6) 8.475 .014
 No 147 (63.9) 29 (65.9) 20 (95.24) 196 (66.4)
Do you know pharmacovigilance?
 Yes 50 (21.74) 22 (50) 15 (71.43) 87 (29.5) 33.309 .000
 No 180 (78.3) 22 (50) 6 208 (70.5)
Do you know national ADR reporting system?
 Yes 121 (52.6) 37 (84.1) 17 (80.95) 175 (59.3) 19.55 .000
 No 109 (47.4) 7 (15.9) 4 120 (40.7)
How are ADRs reported?
 Those who know any method(s) of ADR reporting (by telephone, post, and e-mail)a 128 (55.7) 36 (81.82) 18 (85.71) 182 (61.69) 16.220 .000
 Those who do not know any methods of ADR reporting 102 (44.4) 8 (18.2) 3 113 (38.3)
Do you know availability of ADR reporting form?
 Yes 130 (56.5) 34 (77.27) 17 (80.95) 181 (61.36) 10.370 .006
 No 100 (34.5) 10 (27.72) 4 114 (38.64)
Do you think that ADRs are well documented at the time a drug is marketed?
 Yes 116 (50.4) 26 (59.1) 10 (47.62) 152 (51.53) 1.246 .536
 No 114 (49.6) 18 (40.9) 11 (52.38) 143 (48.47)

Note. Association is done using Pearson chi-square test, P < .05 considered to be statistically significant. HFSUH = Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital; ADR = adverse drug reaction.

a

Indicates some participants selected more than 1 answer.