Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;10:2785–2797. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S171239

Table 3.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of potential factors affecting OS, PFS, and DMFS

Variables OS
PFS
DMFS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Age (years) 0.009 0.025
 <60 Ref Ref
 ≥60 1.864 (1.167–2.979) 1.529 (1.054–2.219)
Sex
 Male
 Female
Tumor classificationa 0.017 0.014
 T1–T2 Ref Ref
 T3–T4 1.497 (1.074–2.087) 1.789 (1.124–2.850)
Nodal classificationa 0.008 0.001 <0.001
 N0–N1 Ref Ref Ref
 N2–N3 1.836 (1.171–2.878) 1.774 (1.264–2.490) 2.917 (1.751–4.859)
Chemotherapy
 Yes
 No
Prognostic nutritional index 0.047 0.166 0.002
 ≥53.0 Ref Ref Ref
 <53.0 1.602 (1.006–2.549) 1.276 (0.904–1.801) 2.134 (1.332–3.421)
Systemic immune-inflammation index 0.003 0.002 0.002
 <527.20 Ref Ref Ref
 ≥527.20 1.950 (1.256–3.028) 1.706 (1.223–2.379) 2.089 (1.310–3.331)

Notes: Bolding shows P value < 0.05.

a

TNM staging system according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th edition).

Abbreviations: DMFS, distant metastasis–free survival; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression–free survival; Ref, reference.