Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;8(2):259–267. doi: 10.1159/000490240

Table 3.

Association between the 6-CIT and adverse outcomes in older acutely hospitalized patients

6-CIT ≤10 6-CIT ≤11 OR (95% CI) p value
Primary outcome: 90-day functional decline and mortalitya
 Crude 1 (Ref) 1.64 (1.13–2.39) 0.010
 Model 1 - corrected for age and sex 1 (Ref) 1.48 (1.01–2.17) 0.045
 Model 2 - age, sex, living situation, and specialism 1 (Ref) 1.44 (0.98–2.11) 0.066

Secondary outcome: ≥7 days LOSb
 Crude 1 (Ref) 1.63 (1.20–2.22) 0.002
 Model 1 - corrected for age and sex 1 (Ref) 1.51 (1.11–2.07) 0.009
 Model 2 - age, sex, living situation, and specialism 1 (Ref) 1.54 (1.12–2.12) 0.008
Secondary outcome: new institutionalizationc
 Crude 1 (Ref) 3.74 (2.14–6.56) <0.001
 Model 1 - corrected for age and sex 1 (Ref) 2.94 (1.64–5.28) <0.001
 Model 2 - age, sex, living situation, and specialism 1 (Ref) 3.45 (1.89–6.31) <0.001
Secondary outcome: in-hospital mortalityd
 Crude 1 (Ref) 3.67 (1.48–9.10) 0.005
 Model 1 - corrected for age and sex 1 (Ref) 3.18 (1.26–8.05) 0.015
 Model 2 - age, sex, living situation, and specialism 1 (Ref) 3.11 (1.21–7.99) 0.018

OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; 6-CIT, Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test.

a

Patients included for analysis: 977.

b

Patients included for analysis: 1,247.

c

Patients included for analysis: 905.

d

Patients included for analysis: 1,236.