. 2018 Aug 21;13(8):e0200745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200745

Table 3. The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two data sets.

References	Methods description	Dataset	Correlation	Dice	HausdorffDist
Thiruvenkadam et al.	DWT for pre- and post-processing, FCM for brain tissues segmentation	BRATS	0.865	0.785	4.35
Thiruvenkadam et al.		HNPPN	0.85	0.775	4.75
Zhao et al.	SLIC+ texture and merges, with spectral feature + PCA + SVM	BRATS	0.835	0.745	5.35
Zhao et al.	SLIC+ texture and merges, with spectral feature + PCA + SVM	HNPPN	0.78	0.685	5.9
Gu et al.	A single click ensemble segmentation (SCES) approach	BRATS	0.775	0.675	6.35
Gu et al.	A single click ensemble segmentation (SCES) approach	HNPPN	0.84	0.765	5.25
Proposed Methods		BRATS	0.905	0.805	3.8
Proposed Methods		HNPPN	0.915	0.82	3.5