Table 2.
Results of suggested algorithm correlated with other studies for macular oedema detection
| Author | Techniques | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Accuracy, % | Number of images | Dataset used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tariq et al. [14] | filter bank and GMM | 97.2 | 98.32 | 97.89 | 1281 | STARE & MESSIDOR |
| Medhi et al. [15] | image processing | 98.05 | 98.86 | — | — | — |
| Deepak and Sivaswamy [16] | rotational asymmetric motion pattern | 95 | 90 | — | 400 | MESSIDOR |
| Lim et al. [17] | marker-controlled watershed transform |
80.9 | 90.2 | — | 88 | MESSIDOR |
| Rahim et al. [18] | fuzzy image processing | 86.8 | 100 | 93 | 600 | Novel |
| suggested method | image processing | 97.75 | 100 | 98.86 | 89 | DIARETDB1 |