Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;42(5):453–463. doi: 10.1177/0165025417729223

Table 2.

Comparisons of Latent Profile Analyses with 1 to 6 Classes for Adolescents (n = 866) and Mothers (n = 668), with Selected Solutions in Boldface Type.

Number of classes Log L AIC BIC aBIC LMR (p value) VLMR (p value) Entropy Class 1 n Class 2 n Class 3 n Class 4 n Class 5 n Class 6 n
Adolescents
 1 -3684.90 7381.80 7410.39 7391.33 n/a n/a n/a 866
 2 -3585.04 7196.08 7258.01 7216.73 0.23 0.22 0.59 258 608
 3 -3550.07 7140.15 7235.42 7171.91  0.18 0.18 0.59 515 138 213
4 -3517.73 7089.46 7218.08 7132.34 0.02 0.02 0.61 390 207 112 157
 5 -3496.37 7060.73 7222.71 7114.73 0.03 0.03 0.66 266 126 60 305 109
 6 -3479.71 7041.42 7236.74 7106.54 0.16 0.15 0.69 140 265 100 296 61 4
Mothers
 1 -2842.05 5696.10 5723.13 5704.08 n/a n/a n/a 668
 2 -2719.57 5465.15 5523.70 5482.43 0.001 0.001 0.59 366 302
3 -2679.98 5399.95 5490.04 5426.54 0.17 0.17 0.58 132 369 167
 4 -2659.65 5373.30 5494.91 5409.19 0.14 0.13 0.71 315 232 21 100
 5 -2644.24 5356.48 5509.62 5401.67 0.26 0.25 0.75 21 313 2 101 231
 6 -2628.14 5338.28 5522.95 5392.78 0.40 0.39 0.75 9 122 270 248 17 2

Notes: Log L = log likelihood value; AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; aBIC = adjusted Bayesian information criterion; LMR = Lo–Mendell–Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test; VLMR = Vuong–Lo–Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test; n/a = not applicable.