Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;9(1):e6–e13.

Table 3.

Results from the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET)

Means (SD)
Show 1
(n=39)
Show 2
(n=21)
1. The purpose of the activity was clearly explained 2.28 (0.91) 1.59 (0.51)
2. The supports I needed to participate were available (e.g. travel, child care, etc.) 2.34 (1.16) 2.40 (0.91)
3. I had enough information to contribute to the topic being discussed 2.20 (0.86) 1.81 (0.54)
4. I was able to express my views freely 2.36 (0.96) 1.63 (0.50)
5. I feel that my views were heard 2.44 (0.88) 1.56 (0.51)
6. A wide range of views on the topic were expressed 2.75 (1.18) 1.94 (1.03)
7. I feel that the input provided through this activity will be considered by the organizers 1.89 (0.75) 1.75 (0.45)
8. The activity achieved its stated objectives 2.39 (0.80) 1.75 (0.45)
9. I understand how the input from this activity will be used 3.03 (1.13) 1.94 (0.57)
10. I think this activity will make a difference 2.54 (0.85) 2.00 (0.63)
11. As a result of my participation in this activity, I am better informed about barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare for homeless individuals. 2.14 (0.91) 2.00 (0.89)
12. As a result of my participation in this activity, I have greater trust in my ability to influence health policy change 2.97(1.01) 2.38 (0.89)
13. Overall, I was satisfied with this activity 2.20 (0.83) 1.81 (0.54)
14. This activity was a good use of my time 2.24 (0.92) 1.63 (0.50)

1: Strongly Agree; 2: Agree; 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree; 4: Disagree; 5: Strongly Disagree