Table 2.

Comparison of original and proposed CMB detection algorithm.

Algorithm	True CMBs		Sensitivity	False positives		Computation	Image Type	Features
	Total	Mean		Total	Per patient
Bian et al.	304	30.4	86.5%	449	44.9	1 min	mIP SWI	–
Morrison et al.	248	24.8	86.7%	0a	0a	9–22 min avg. 14.5 min	SWI	segmentation FP labelling

^azero as perceived by any one rater, however small variations exist relative to another rater.