TABLE 3.
Results of simultaneous autoregression models of the effect of freshwater fishing demand and dasymetric population density on rarified plant and animal richness
| Std B | SE | Nagelkerke R2 | AIC | df | z value | Pr (>|z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All data | |||||||
| Rarified animal richness | |||||||
| Population density | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 1,238.50 | 1,248 | 7.78 | <.001 |
| Freshwater fishing | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 1,248.10 | 1,248 | 7.14 | <.001 |
| Rarified plant richness | |||||||
| Population density | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.39 | 883.20 | 828 | 6.99 | <.001 |
| Freshwater fishing | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 848.55 | 828 | 9.42 | <.001 |
| 2005+ | |||||||
| Rarified animal richness | |||||||
| Population density | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 623.53 | 531 | 6.22 | <.001 |
| Freshwater fishing | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 600.28 | 531 | 8.01 | <.001 |
| Rarified plant richness | |||||||
| Population density | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 655.22 | 513 | 6.94 | <.001 |
| Freshwater fishing | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.35 | 610.42 | 513 | 10.00 | <.001 |