Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):e021445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021445

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of contextual variables by perceived neighbourhood scale: percentages, means and SD

Contextual variables Neighbourhood extension scale (1–4 and %)* OR (95% CI)† P values
1
(57.8%)
2
(23.3%)
3
(7.4%)
4
(11.5%)
Connectivity‡
 0 to 3 39.91 40.91 41.87 40.37 1.00
 4 23.92 23.42 36.11 25.28 1.04 (0.83 to 1.30) 0.760
 5 to 9 37.17 35.63 22.02 34.34 0.85 (0.70 to 1.04) 0.120
Mean (SD) OR (95% CI)† P values
Aesthetic quality domain 2.96 (0.03) 3.07 (0.04) 3.06 (0.07) 3.09 (0.04) 1.23 (1.03 to 1.46) 0.020
Walking environment domain 3.20 (0.01) 3.24 (0.02) 3.27 (0.02) 3.28 (0.02) 3.37 (2.09 to 5.44) <0.001
Violence scale domain 1.90 (0.02) 1.95 (0.03) 1.89 (0.05) 2.00 (0.04) 1.20 (1.03 to 1.40) 0.020
Safety scale domain 2.96 (0.03) 2.93 (0.05) 2.89 (0.09) 2.86 (0.05) 0.92 (0.79 to 1.08) 0.190
Population density (per square kilometre) 12 487.35 (791.26) 11 740.34 (704.83) 12 274.31 (740.63) 12 627.22 (865.05) 1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) 0.650

*(1) up to the block or street you live on; (2) within five blocks; (3) within 10 blocks; and (4) more than 10 blocks away.

†Estimated by a multilevel ordinal logistic regression model, with reference category being the smaller neighbourhood.

‡Zero indicates poorly connected streets and nine indicates heavily connected streets.