Table 1. Advantages and limitations of evaluation methods for intestinal barrier function.
Advantages | Limitations | |
---|---|---|
Intestinal permeability | ||
In vivo | ||
51Cr-EDTA | Whole intestine, easy detection, not naturally present | Limited use in humans being radio-active, single probe |
PEGs | Whole intestine | Laborious detection with HPLC, GC-MS or LC-MS |
Sugars | Combination in multi-sugar tests, widely used | Baseline food contamination, laborious detection with HPLC, GC-MS or LC-MS |
Sucrose | Specific for stomach | Degraded by sucrase in the duodenum |
Lactulose | Specific for small intestine | Degraded by intestinal bacteria |
Mannitol, Rhamnose | Specific for small intestine | Degraded by intestinal bacteria |
Sucralose | Resistive to bacterial degradation | Long collection time |
Macromolecules | Correlation with food-related antigens | Limited use in humans |
Ovalbumin, HRP, dextrans,… | Specific when used in intestinal loops, differently sized probes | Invasive when used in intestinal loops |
Ex vivo | ||
Ussing chambers | Region-specific, wide range of molecules, combination with cell lines possible | Need for fresh tissue, limited viability (2 hours), laborious, operator-dependent |
In vitro | ||
Intestinal cell lines | Long follow-up times, wide range of molecules, different test conditions | Less representative to the in vivo condition, cell culture variability |
In situ intestinal barrier defects | ||
Mucus & tight junctions | Mechanistic view, co-staining with bacteria possible | Does not represent functional characteristics of the barrier |
Biomarkers | ||
Urine | ||
Claudin proteins | Rapid detection of tight junction loss without tissue sections/test molecules | Non-specific for gut (e.g. release from kidney epithelia) |
FABP | Region-specific dependent on isoform, detectable in urine and blood | Only useful for acute damage |
α-GST | Detectable in urine and blood | Non-specific, possibly only useful for acute damage |
Blood | ||
FABP | Region-specific dependent on isoform, detectable in urine and blood | Only useful for acute damage |
α-GST | Detectable in urine and blood | Non-specific, possibly only useful for acute damage |
Citrulline | Specific for enterocytes, not present in exogenous sources | Laborious detection |
Zonulin | Specific for the small intestine, correlation with IP | Low specificity for detection with ELISA |
Bacteria and bacterial products | Representation of effective bacterial translocation | Not all bacteria can be cultured, high false positive rate for LPS detection |
EndoCab | Indirect representation of effective bacterial translocation | Indirect marker for bacterial translocation, correlation with IP conflicting |
D-lactate | Easy detection | Limited data in humans |
Faeces | ||
Calprotectin | Stable in faeces for up to 7 days at room temperature, easily detectable | Indirect marker dependent on presence of intestinal inflammation |
51Cr-EDTA, Crohmium-labelled EDTA; PEG, polyethylene glycol; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; FABP, fatty acid-binding proteins; GST, glutathione S-transferase; EndoCab, endotoxin core antibodies; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; GC-MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry; LC-MS, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; IP, intestinal permeability