Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Sea Res. 2018 Mar;133:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2017.02.005

Table 2.

Questions associated with ballast water monitoring, and applicable genetic tools. Different nucleic acids-based detection methods satisfy different criteria and are associated with different challenges to technology development and deployment.

Management/science question Criteria that must be satisfied to answer question Possible genetic tools Most significant challenges
Single species approaches
Does the sample contain target species X? Target specificity, sensitivity PCR/qPCR or other probe-based detection methods Managing false positive and negative errors
What is the abundance of target species X in the sample? Target specificity, sensitivity, quantification qPCR or other probe-based detection method calibrated for quantification of target Managing false positive and negative errors, plus calibration for robust quantification of target
Does the sample comply with a standard? Target specificity, sensitivity, quantification, viability qPCR targeting transcripts associated with viability Managing false positive and negative errors, calibration for robust quantification of target, plus identification of targets tightly associated with viability and possibly additional costs associated with handling RNA targets
Community approaches
What species are in the sample? Broad community profiling, sensitivity HTS metabarcoding Gaps in reference databases, difficulty interpreting data from rare species, not amenable to fast turnaround
What is the overall biodiversity (species richness and abundance) in the sample? Broad community profiling, sensitivity, quantification HTS metabarcoding, calibration of sequence frequency data to relative abundance Gaps in reference databases, difficulty interpreting data from rare species, not amenable to fast turnaround, plus calibration for robust quantification