Table 2.
Questions associated with ballast water monitoring, and applicable genetic tools. Different nucleic acids-based detection methods satisfy different criteria and are associated with different challenges to technology development and deployment.
Management/science question | Criteria that must be satisfied to answer question | Possible genetic tools | Most significant challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Single species approaches | |||
Does the sample contain target species X? | Target specificity, sensitivity | PCR/qPCR or other probe-based detection methods | Managing false positive and negative errors |
What is the abundance of target species X in the sample? | Target specificity, sensitivity, quantification | qPCR or other probe-based detection method calibrated for quantification of target | Managing false positive and negative errors, plus calibration for robust quantification of target |
Does the sample comply with a standard? | Target specificity, sensitivity, quantification, viability | qPCR targeting transcripts associated with viability | Managing false positive and negative errors, calibration for robust quantification of target, plus identification of targets tightly associated with viability and possibly additional costs associated with handling RNA targets |
Community approaches | |||
What species are in the sample? | Broad community profiling, sensitivity | HTS metabarcoding | Gaps in reference databases, difficulty interpreting data from rare species, not amenable to fast turnaround |
What is the overall biodiversity (species richness and abundance) in the sample? | Broad community profiling, sensitivity, quantification | HTS metabarcoding, calibration of sequence frequency data to relative abundance | Gaps in reference databases, difficulty interpreting data from rare species, not amenable to fast turnaround, plus calibration for robust quantification |