Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 4;38(9):1679–1689. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4095-0

Table 2.

Comparison of visceral fat-related variables between patients with RA and the control group, before and after propensity score matching

Sex Variables Before matching After matching*
RA patients Controls p value RA patients Controls p value
Women n 292 482 226 226
Age, years 61.4 ± 12.2 53.9 ± 11.7 < 0.001 58.7 ± 11.8 58.7 ± 11.8 0.959
Body Mass Index, kg/m2 22.3 ± 3.7 23.0 ± 3.4 0.012 22.6 ± 3.8 22.6 ± 3.0 0.925
WC, cm 83.3 ± 10.2 82.0 ± 9.1 0.074 82.9 ± 0.6 82.9 ± 0.6 0.976
VFA, cm2 56.0 ± 28.1 53.1 ± 27.0 0.145 55.3 ± 29.0 53.8 ± 23.7 0.538
V/S ratio 0.40 ± 0.18 0.33 ± 0.15 < 0.001 0.39 ± 0.18 0.34 ± 0.13 0.002
VFA ≥ 100 cm2, n (%) 25 (8.6) 23 (4.8) 0.034 19 (8.4) 7 (3.1) 0.015
SFA, cm2 152.5 ± 72.9 173.1 ± 70.4 < 0.001 156.3 ± 75.2 168.6 ± 65.9 0.064
Man n 60 1045 59 59
Age, years 63.8 ± 10.6 52.7 ± 10.9 < 0.001 64.5 ± 9.1 64.3 ± 9.4 0.905
Body Mass Index 24.2 ± 3.2 24.2 ± 2.9 0.998 24.3 ± 3.0 24.7 ± 3.2 0.481
WC, cm 88.1 ± 1.0 86.3 ± 0.3 0.084 88.6 ± 8.4 89.7 ± 7.6 0.459
VFA, cm2 90.3 ± 37.5 79.0 ± 34.5 0.015 91.7 ± 36.4 89.8 ± 35.0 0.778
V/S ratio 0.57 ± 0.17 0.48 ± 0.16 < 0.001 0.58 ± 0.16 0.51 ± 0.13 0.013
VFA ≥ 100 cm2, n (%) 23 (38.3) 232 (22.2) 0.004 23 (39.0) 22 (37.3) 0.850
SFA, cm2 158.2 ± 53.9 163.1 ± 53.9 0.450 159.7 ± 53.1 174.4 ± 54.5 0.139

Values are shown as mean ± SD or number (percentage)

WC waist circumference, VFA visceral fat area, V/S visceral fat area/subcutaneous area, SFA subcutaneous fat area

*The matching ratio is 1:1 with adjusting for age, Body Mass Index and waist circumference

t test for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables