Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018 Jul 3;89(3):314–323. doi: 10.1111/cen.13761

TABLE 2.

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Variable Studies included (references) RR, 95% Cl, P-value Heterogeneity (I2), P-value
Sex and fracture type
 Men
  All fractures N = 4 (14,16,19,20) RR 1.73, 95% Cl 1.50–2.30, P < .001* 86%, P < .001
  Hip fracture N = 2 (14,16) RR 3.67, 95% Cl 2.10–6.41, P < .001* 58%, P = .12
 Women
  All fractures N = 6 (all studies) RR 1.85 95% Cl 1.37–2.20, P < .001* 71%, P = .004
Hip fracture N = 2 (14,16) RR 5.79, 95% Cl 3.55–9.44, P < .001* 43%, P = .15
Higher quality studies (all fractures) N = 3 (14, 16, 19) RR 2.25, 95% Cl 1.61–3.14, P < .001* 94%, P < .001
Excluding outliersa(all fractures) N = 4 (14, 19, 21, 22) RR 1.53, 95% Cl 1.47–1.61, P < .001* 0%, P = .85
Ratio of relative risks (RRR) between sexes, by fracture type
 All fractures N = 6 (all studies) RRR 0.94, 95% Cl 0.68–1.29, Z = −0.41b P = .68
 Hip fracture N = 2 (14,16) RRR 0.63, 95% Cl 0.30–1.33, Z = −1.20b P = .23
*

Denotes significant P-value.

a

Fixed effects model used due to low heterogeneity.

b

Denotes Z-score (test of interaction).