Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 May 11;65(9):e27232. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27232

Table 2.

Comparison of presenting features and treatments between survivor participants with or without ovarian transposition

Ovarian transposition
(N=49)
Non-ovarian transposition
(N=41)
P Value
Age at diagnosis, Median (range) 15 (4-19) 16 (6-22) 0.0417
Age at Questionnaire, Median (range) 38 (25-51) 39 (26-60) 0.9353
Age at primary ovarian insufficiency, Median (range) 22.7 (15.3-38.2) 17.9 (15.5-35.0) 0.2629
Race 0.9626
 White 42 (85.7) 35 (85.4)
 Non-white 7 (14.3) 6 (14.6)
Alkylating Agent Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (N, %), mg/m2 0.0445
 0 to <= 8000 19 (39.6) 26 (66.7)
 8000 to <= 12000 12 (25.0) 6 (15.4)
 12000 to <= 20000 13 (27.1) 7 (18.0)
 > 20000 4 (8.3) 0 (0.0)
 Median (range) 10151.7 (1806.2-28980.0) 7434.6 (1800.0-16486.8)
Pelvic radiation dose (N, %), cGy <.0001
 ≤ 1500 9 (18.4) 23 (60.5)
 > 1500 40 (81.6) 15 (39.5)
Pregnancy 0.1459
 Yes 30 (61.2) 31 (75.6)
 No 19 (38.8) 10 (24.4)
 Age at first pregnancy, Median (range) 23.5 (17.0-38.0) 22.0 (13.0-34.0) 0.1693
Live birth delivery* 0.9663
 Yes 27 (90.0) 28 (90.3)
 No 3 (10.0) 3 (9.7)
 Age at first live birth delivery, Median (range) 24.0 (17.0-36.0) 22.5 (16.0-34.0) 0.3272
*

Analysis for the live birth delivery was based on patients who have reported pregnancy (N=61, 30 in OT and 31 in non-OT group)