Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2018 Sep-Oct;39(5):969–979. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000558

Table 3.

ANOVA models. The prescriptive procedure model included the adults with SNHL only. The hearing status and age model included the adults and children with and without SNHL. Only the DSL-C data were included in this second model for the participants with SNHL. The compression speed model included the adults from experiment II.

Model Main Effects and Interactions df F p ηp2
Prescriptive Procedure Gap Duration 1.4,20 64 <0.001* 0.82
Prescriptive Procedure 1,14 496 <0.001* 0.97
Gap Duration × Prescriptive Procedure 1.3,32 .513 0.530 0.04
Hearing Status and Age Gap Duration 2.1,115 106 <0.001* 0.66
Age Group 1,54 9 0.005* 0.14
Hearing Status 1,54 2 0.131 0.04
Gap Duration × Age 2.1,115 2 0.125 0.04
Gap Duration × Hearing Status 2.1,115 8 <0.001* 0.14
Age × Hearing Status 1,54 3 0.094 0.05
Gap Duration × Age × Hearing Status 2.1,115 4 0.024* 0.07
Compression Speed Gap Duration 1.1,7.5 18.5 0.003* 0.73
Compression Speed 1,7 2.2 0.180 0.24
Gap Duration × Speed 1.7,12.2 1.5 0.255 0.18

df, degrees of freedom (effect, residuals); F, F-ratio; p, probability value; ηp2, eta squared effect size;

*

p < .05.