Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug;56(2):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.028

Table 1.

Included study characteristics.

Study and design Population, age, average time from symptoms to scan Dose FGD injected Uptake time and protocol Primary endpoint measure Findings (FDG)
Rudd et al. 200211
Patient cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG with carotid disease, PET/CT, histology
n = 8 patients,
symptomatic disease (mean age 63.5, 75% male, 3.5 months)
370 MBq over 60 s 190 min ± 6
Reconstructed images with 3D re-projection, corrected for attenuation
FDG accumulation rate, volumes of interest (VOI) Higher 18F-FDG PET/CT signals in symptomatic versus asymptomatic disease (p = .005) verified histologically (CD68)
Davies et al. 200512
Prospective cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG with carotid disease, PET, MRI
n = 12 patients,
culprit carotid disease (mean age 71, 83% male, 64 days)
185 MBq 120 min
Reconstructed emission images using PROMIS 3D filtered back projection algorithm
Uptake ratio (FDG in plaque divided by normal arterial wall FDG) Higher FDG uptake ratios in symptomatic carotid disease
Arauz et al. 200713
Prospective cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG with carotid disease, PET/CT
n = 13 patients,
high and low uptake (mean age 66.1, 69% male, 25 days)
370 MBq 90 min
6 h fast, image acquisition in 3D mode, attenuated corrected
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) Patients with symptomatic carotid disease had higher FDG uptake, as well as with stenosis (p ≤ .001)
Kwee et al. 201114
Prospective cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG with carotid disease, PET/CT
n = 50 patients,
symptomatic carotid disease (mean age 67.8, 68% male, 33.3 days)
200 MBq 60 min
12 h fast, 3D mode, 120 kVp, 175 mAs, field of view 250 × 250 mm.
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) Significant correlation between FDG signal and CT characteristics in symptomatic plaque (p < .05)
Grandpierre et al. 201115
Retrospective, cohort study, IV administration of FDG, PET/CT
n = 23 patient,
cancer patients admitted with stroke due to carotid disease (mean age 66, 86% male, 7 months)
400 MBq 60 min
6 h fast, 3D mode, 120 kV, 80 mAs, field of view 512 × 512 mm, 3 min per bed position
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) Higher FDG uptake in patient who had stroke in the carotid artery was compared to no stroke patients (p = .006)
Marnane et al. 201216
Patient cohort study, symptomatic stroke patients, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT
n = 60 patients
13 recurrences (mean age 67.3, 85% male, 5 days)
47 no recurrence (mean age 71.6, 68% male, 7 days)
320 MBq 120 min
6 h fast, image acquired in 3D mode, 2 bed positions for 10 min
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) Higher uptake of 18F-FDG in patients with recurrent strokes (p = .02), mean plaque FDG only predictor of stroke recurrence (HR 6.1, 1.3–28.8, p = .02)
Muller et al. 201417
Patient cohort study, symptomatic stroke patients, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT
n = 123
60 symptomatic
63 asymptomatic (mean age 72, 76% male)
370 MBq 90 min
6 h fast, 3D mode, matric 336 × 336 pixels, attenuated corrected
Target to background ratios (TBRs) Significantly higher FDG uptake in symptomatic high risk carotid plaques (p < .0018)
Taqueti et al. 201418
Patient cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT, DCE-MRI
n = 32 patients
symptomatic disease (mean age 68, 50% male)
370 MBq 90 min
3D list mode, in 1 bed position over 20 min
Radiation exposure 8 mSv
Target to background ratios (TBRs) 18F-FDG signals correlate highly with markers of macrophage density, in symptomatic plaque (p < .001)
Shaikh et al. 201419
Patient cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG, cf. femoral plaque
n = 35 patients
29 symptomatic carotid and 5 asymptomatic (mean age 67, 76% male)
185 MBq 60 min
6 h fast, 3D mode, 120 kV attenuation correc. Radiation 27.4 mSv
Regions of interest (ROI) and hot average Significantly higher hot average in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic carotid plaques (p = .053)
Skagen et al. 201520
Prospective patient cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT
n = 36 patients
18 symptomatic, 18 asymptomatic
(mean age 67, 72% male)
370 MBq 90 min
6 h fast, 2D OSEM algorithm, with matrix 256 × 256 pixels
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) Significantly higher hot average in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid plaques (p = .003)
Quirce et al. 201621
Prospective patient cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG and 18F—NaF, PET/CT
n = 18 patients
9 symptomatic, 9 asymptomatic (mean age 67, 88% male)
450 MBq 180 min
6 h fast, 5 min per bed space, 130 kV, 50 mAs 11.3 mSv radiation dose
Standardised uptake values (SUVs) No significant difference in FDG uptake in symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaque (p = .85)
Vesey et al. 201722
Prospective case control study, IV administration of 18F-FDG and NaF, high risk plaque
n = 26 patients
18 carotid group (mean age 71.7, 66.7% male)
8 control group (mean age 66.1, 50% male)
200 MBq 90 min
6 h fast, 3D mode, 120 kV, 2 bed positions for 20 min per bed.
Target to background ratios (TBRs) 18F-FDG higher uptake in culprit vessel vs. control (p = .014), log10 transformed data
Tarkin et al. 201723
Prospective cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT, 68Ga-DOTATATE
n = 28 patients
14 in carotid group (mean age 71, 75% male, 18 days)
14 in control (mean age 72.3, 76% male)
248.1 ± 22.3 MBq 90 min
6 h fast, 4 bed positions for 15 min, radiation 30 mSv, VUE FX recons
Target to background ratios (TBRs) Significant uptake of FDG in symptomatic plaques versus control (p < .001)
Joshi et al. 201724
Prospective cohort study, IV administration of 18F-FDG, PET/CT, FMISO tracer
n = 16 patients
8 patients in carotid group (mean age 73, 70% male, 16 days)
8 patients control (mean age 71, 50% male)
250 MBq 120 min
6 h fast, one bed position for 15 min, 3D mode, VUE FX recons, radiation 10.4 mSv
Target to background ratios (TBRs) Higher uptake of FDG in culprit lesions (TBR 1.94 versus 1.90), despite p > .05 trend toward significance