Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;8:12597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30722-0

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The 1-2-Go and 1-2-3-Go interval reproduction task. (A,B) Task design. Each trial began with the appearance of a fixation spot (Fix on). The color of the fixation spot informed the subject of the trial type: blue for 1-2-Go, and red for 1-2-3-Go. After a random delay, a warning stimulus (large white circle) appeared. Additionally, two or three small white rectangles were presented above the fixation spot. The number of rectangles was associated with the number of upcoming flashes. After another random delay, two (S1 and S2 for 1-2-Go) or three (S1, S2 and S3 for 1-2-3-Go) white annulae were flashed for 100 ms in a sequence around the fixation spot. Consecutive flashes were separated by the duration of the sample interval (ts). With the disappearance of each flash, one of the small rectangles also disappeared (rightmost first and leftmost last). The white rectangles were provided to help subjects keep track of events during the trial. Subjects had to press a button after the last flash to produce an interval (tp) that matched ts. Immediately after button press, subjects received feedback. The feedback was a small circle that was presented to the left or right of the warning stimulus depending on whether tp was larger or smaller than ts, respectively. The distance of the feedback circle to the center of the warning stimulus was proportional to the magnitude of the error (tp − ts). (C) Experimental distribution of sample intervals. (D) Feedback. Subjects received positive feedback if production times fell within the green region. The width of the positive feedback window was scaled with ts.