Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;62(8):e00634-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00634-18

TABLE 2.

Piperaquine pharmacokinetic parameters for participants in step 1a

PK parameter Valuesb for participants in the following study groups:
NVP/ART-naive participants
LPV/r/ART–naive participants
EFV/ART-naive participants
ART naive (n = 6) NVP (n = 5)c LPV/r (n = 6) EFV (n = 6) Geometric mean ratio (90% CI) P valued Geometric mean ratio (90% CI) P value Geometric mean ratio (90% CI) P value
AUC0–28 days (ng · h/ml) 33,385 (26,131–42,652) 43,632 (31,383–60,662) 38,300 (27,256–53,802) 18,914 (14,144–25,291) 1.31 (0.86–1.99) 0.290 1.15 (0.75–1.76) 0.589 0.57 (0.38–0.83) 0.029
Cmax (ng/ml) 350 (252–485) 637 (453–897) 327 (263–406) 253 (156–412) 1.82 (1.13–2.94) 0.061 0.94 (0.63–1.39) 0.775 0.72 (0.40–1.32) 0.371
tmax (h) 3 (2–60) 4 (3–5) 60 (60–60) 3 (2–60) 0.573e 0.049e 1.000e
t1/2 (h)f 332 (174–631) 319 (262–388) 455 (186–1,114) 227 (120–432) 0.36 (0.49–1.89) 0.915 1.37 (0.44–4.31) 0.636 0.68 (0.36–1.30) 0.658
a

ART, antiretroviral therapy; NVP, nevirapine-based ART; EFV, efavirenz-based ART; LPV/r, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based ART; Cmax, maximum concentration, tmax, the time to reach the maximum concentration, t1/2, drug elimination half-life; AUC0–28 days, area under the concentration-time curve from days 0 to 28; Cd7, day 7 piperaquine concentration.

b

Values are presented as the geometric mean (90% confidence interval) for all PK parameters except tmax, the values of which are given as the median (interquartile range).

c

One participant did not complete follow-up and was excluded from the analysis.

d

P values were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in STATA (version 15.0) (α = 0.1), unless indicated otherwise.

e

This P value was calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (α = 0.05).

f

Half-life estimation excluded values below the lower limit of quantification for each participant.