Table 1.
References | Species of macrofungi | Associated animal | Sampling site | Sampling time | Identification method(s) | Sample types | Population (sample) size | Makers/methods | Main result(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nobre et al. 2011b | Termitomyces sp. | Macrotermes bellicosus | Pendjari National Park | – | Morphology of termites | Fungus combs or gut | 24 | ITS, EF1a, RPB2 | Rare events of recombination |
Macrotermes subhyalinus | Pendjari National Park | 9 | ITS, EF1a, RPB2 | Free recombination | |||||
De Fine Licht et al. 2006 | Macrotermes natalensis | South Africa | 2003.01 and 2004.01–03 | Morphology of termites | Fungus combs | 31 | ITS, RPB2, RPB1, EF1a | Free recombination | |
Unpublished data | – | Yunnan China | 2010.08 and 2013.08 | Morphology and ITS | Fruiting bodies | 18 (229) | RPB2, TEF, 12S, LACC | Free recombination | |
Vasiliauskas et al. 1998 | A. areolatum | Sirex juvencus | Lithuania, Sweden, Denmark and Great Britain | – | Morphology | Wood or fruit bodies or glands of woodwasps | 53 | M13 mini satellite and somatic compatibility | Dispersing clonally |
A. chailletii | Urocerus gigas | 57 | Spreading by basidiospores | ||||||
Margrete Thomsen and Koch 1999 | A. areolatum | Sirex juvencus | Denmark (more than 100 km) | 1992–1995 | Morphology | Basidiocarps, wood isolations, woodwasps | 31 | Somatic compatibility | High degree of somatic compatibility between isolates |
A. chailletii | Urocerus gigas | 69 | Rare Somatic compatibility between isolates | ||||||
Liang et al. 2008 | O. sinensis | Ghost moths | Qinghai, Tibet, Yunnan, and Sichuan province of China | – | Morphology | Fruiting bodies | 18(180) | ISSR (9) | Little gene exchange, latitudinal genetic differentiation |
Zhang et al. 2009 | O. sinensis | Ghost moths | Tibet, Qinghai, Sichuan and Yunnan | During 2005 and 2008 | Morphology | Fruiting bodies | 11(56) | ITS, MAT1-2-1 | Greater genetic diversification among southern isolates |
Province in China | |||||||||
Quan et al. 2014 | O. sinensis | Ghost moths | Qinghai, Tibet, Sichuan, Gansu, Yunnan provinces | – | Morphology | Complex of O. sinensis stromata and host cadavers | 33 | ITS, β-tubulin | Similar phylogenetic relationships and genetic structure |
Hepialidae caterpillars | – | COI, COII, Cytb | |||||||
Wang et al. 2008 | C. militaris | – | Guangdong, Hebei, Liaoning, Jilin in China and Seoul in Korea | – | Morphology | Fruiting bodies and fresh mycelia | (13) | ITS, RAPD | Extremely small genetic variation |
Wen et al. 2012 | C. militaris | – | Sichuan province of China | – | Morphology | Fresh mediums | 24 | RAPD, MAT | Genetic variation of different monoconidial isolates |
Rubini et al. 2005 | T. magnatum | – | Italy, Croatia and Slovenia | – | Morphology | Ascomata | 26 (316) | SSR | Positive correlation between genetic and geographical Distances |
Bertault et al. 1998 | T. melanosporum | – | France and Italy | – | Morphology | Ascocarps | 12 (208) | RAPD | Low level of polymorphism |
Murat et al. 2004 | T. melanosporum | – | France, northern Italy and north-eastern Spain | 1998.12–2003.02 | Morphology | Fruit bodies | 17 (188) | RAPD, ITS, SCAR | Significant genetic differentiation between regional populations |
Riccioni et al. 2008 | T. melanosporum | – | Italy, France, Spain | 2000–2006 | Morphology | Ascocarps, hyphal fragments | 13 (210) | SSR, ITS, AFLP | Geographic differentiation among populations |
García-Cunchillos et al. 2014 | T. melanosporum | – | Iberian Peninsula | – | Morphology | Ascocarps | 23 (190) | SSR | High levels of genetic diversity |
Wang et al. 2006a | T. indicum complex | – | Huidong, Kunming Gongshan, Miyi, Panzhihua, Huili | 2003, 2004 and 2005 | Morphology and ITS | Ascocarps | 6 (30) | ITS | Genetic differentiation among regional populations |
5 (26) | β-tubulin | ||||||||
Murat et al. 2013 | T. melanosporum | – | Montemartano and Rollainville | 2010–2011 | Morphology and ITS | Soil, ascocarps and ectomycorrhizal roots | 10 | MAT, SSR | spatial genetic structure |
Note: RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA.