Table 4.
Euprymna clades that demonstrated significance during either a permutation contingency analysis or geographic distance analysis
| Clade | Nested clade | Distance | Value (S or L) | p | Inference key steps | Inference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2‐3 | 1‐6`(T) | D n | 102.87 S | 0.0485 | 1,19, NO | Allopatric fragmentation |
| 1‐5 (I) | D c | 23.288 S | 0.0485 | |||
| D n | 38.528 S | 0.0485 | ||||
| I‐T | D n | −64.3381 S | 0.0485 | |||
| 2‐11 | 1‐21 (T) | D c | 0.0 S | 0.0322 | 1,2,3,4, NO | Restricted gene flow with isolation by distance |
| 3‐1 | 2‐1 (T) | D c | 54.307 S | 0.0094 | 1,2,3,4, NO | Restricted gene flow with isolation by distance |
| 3‐7 | 2‐9 (T) | D n | 97.411 L | 0.048 | 1,2,11,12, NO | Contiguous range expansion |
| 2‐11 (I) | D c | 31.471 S | 0.0406 | |||
| D n | 61.135 S | 0.0417 | ||||
| I‐T | D c | −57.4872 S | 0.0386 | |||
| D n | −36.2756 S | 0.0428 | ||||
| Total | 4‐1 | D c | 75.7056 S | 0.0002 | 1,2, IO | I‐T status undetermined: inconclusive outcome |
| 4‐2 | D c | 0.000 | >0.001 | |||
| D n | 435.1782 L | >0.001 | ||||
| 4‐7 | D c | 67.0744 S | >0.001 | |||
| D n | 82.2657 S |
Location of significance is indicated by (D n), nested clade distance, and/or (D c), the within‐clade distance. I‐T indicates the average distance between a tip clade and an interior clade. S or L indicates that the distance measure is significantly smaller or larger at the 5% inference level. Inference steps were performed using the automated inference key in GEODIS, part of the AneCA v1.2 population genetics analysis software platform (Posada et al., 2000).