Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul-Sep;22(3):244–252. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180032

Table 1.

Fertility preservation techniques.

Technique Advantage Disadvantage Practice
IVF and embryo cryopreservation Most effective COS
Requires partner or donor
Requires time for stimulation
Standard
Mature oocyte cryopreservation Effective
Does not require partner or donor
COS
Requires time for stimulation
Few pregnancies reported
Standard
Immature oocyte cryopreservation and in vitro maturation No delay in treatment
No COS
Does not require partner or donor
Few pregnancies reported Experimental
Ovarian cortex cryopreservation No COS
No delay in treatment
Suitable for  prepubertal girls
Requires surgery
Few pregnancies reported
Potential risk of cancer grafts
Experimental
Ovarian supression with GnRH No COS
No delay in treatment
Non invasive
Effectiveness not proven
Climateric symptoms
Not proven

COS:Controlled ovarian stimulation