Table 1.
Technique | Advantage | Disadvantage | Practice |
---|---|---|---|
IVF and embryo cryopreservation | Most effective | COS Requires partner or donor Requires time for stimulation |
Standard |
Mature oocyte cryopreservation | Effective Does not require partner or donor |
COS Requires time for stimulation Few pregnancies reported |
Standard |
Immature oocyte cryopreservation and in vitro maturation | No delay in treatment No COS Does not require partner or donor |
Few pregnancies reported | Experimental |
Ovarian cortex cryopreservation | No COS No delay in treatment Suitable for prepubertal girls |
Requires surgery Few pregnancies reported Potential risk of cancer grafts |
Experimental |
Ovarian supression with GnRH | No COS No delay in treatment Non invasive |
Effectiveness not
proven Climateric symptoms |
Not proven |
COS:Controlled ovarian stimulation